all 11 comments

[–][deleted] 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Not the first time he's worn a ball gag.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

It's a little ironic the left likes to poke fun at Graham for being a fag.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Not sure it's just a 'fag' reference, if Graham is also into S&M (in the pic).

Comments in the Senate immediately after the attack, and by him, indicated their general agreement that the attack was quite serious. But the Response to it recently confirms that those who voted to acquit wanted to protect Trump and - very likely themselves - from future blame for the attack. A definite conflict of interest for some of those Senators. Were they to impeach Trump, they would have admitted that he, and some of them, encouraged the revolt.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

As far as revolts go, it was a pretty lame one anyways. As a nation I think we definitely need to collectively unclench our assholes. Hell, make this an event. Have an annual redneck revolt party at the Capitol every year with a reenactment, complete with our sitting politicians cowering under their desks.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Or also a reenactment of the 1812 burning of the Capitol building (by the Brits), perhaps with a large model building (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burning_of_Washington).

The Brits do the opposite, and burn Guy Fawkes in effigy eash November (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guy_Fawkes_Night).

Perhaps a US version could have an effigy of Trump burned every 6 January. Now let's see, how to propose a Federal Holiday in the US...?

I'm not trying to be sarcastic, as I do agree with your point.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Yes, instead of actually protesting, let's set up a Federal holy day to pretend to protest. /s

You sicken me.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You had a preexisting condition.

Perhaps instead of an effigy of Trump on the bonfire, the real one is used next 6 January? Is that better?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

You have gotten better at this. Good for you.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

See you at the bonfire next January.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

You could never meet someone like me in real life, even if you tried. You'd look on the street corner expecting to find me deranged and in need of assistance. I have been behind the closed doors, socks. You should try to get a glimpse. You'd never support their federated shit ever again if you only accepted reality.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It might help to know that my notes in this thread are due to frustration and sarcasm, rather than actual threats. But I am happy to speak plainly about any of this. And if you have anything to say about federated activities I am interested in discussing it. I am not trying to guess who you are. If you have serious concerns, I will take them seriously.