They got most of the population to believe that the drone from Stewart airport that flew into the Pentagon, if one even did, was the official story passenger jet. So, their is a possibility that UA93 or a drone flying into WTC7 was the initial plan. The Pentagon wall exactly where the "plane" hit had a massive rebuild not too long before 9/11. Who was the company?

I know that the two planes that hit the towers were rabbi Dov Zakheim's passenger jet tankers; drones that flew into beacons. The actual passenger planes likely used fake passenger manifests with aliases who were in on the plan, as written out in Operation Northwoods. Letsrollforums had exposed many fake passengers who are still alive with aliases and now millions of dollars, likely bought off. You can find thousands of people in the world who would do anything for money.

Also, the planes were not at full capacity. Plus, all the Zionist actors who said they missed these flights because they were late, yeah, not buying it, sounds like they were tasked with propagandizing to their audiances that the planes were the actual planes of the offical fairytale.

Either, UA93 was the actual plane or a drone. Did UA93 even leave the airport that day? Did it land in Cleavland? ARCGIS data of flight radar shows that after UA93 supposedly crashed the data showed it was still flying towards Cleavland and likely landed their and it's number was quickly switched.

NORAD's computer system was controlled by an Israeli firm. Think about it. The MIC would have planned MUCH BETTER if they planned on crashing a drone into an empty mining shaft. Of course, the debris would be a major problem. Investigators would easily determine what kind of plane it was. The heroic "Lets roll" patriotic narrative could have been prewritten; it's just so perfect but the aftermath of the "crash" shows it seemed like they did this all on a whom. So what happened? The offical story shows and others have further proved that the debris field was around 5 miles. Which means that the plane or drone was likely blown up in the air. Are their any witnesses accounting for this? Maybe the drone went of course, so they had to shoot it down.

The alleged wing marks of where UA93 hit the soil of the field on that day were already on google maps in 1994. So, they likely picked this spot on a whim. Whatever blew up in the air or crashed in the feild that day was not UA93, for it co tinues to fly well after the fact. It was a drone. If theu used passenger jet drones to hit the towers, they had to use drones for 77 and ua93 or maybe they were simply ghost planes. That is they simply used the actual flights of 77 and 93 and ghosted them and then created the needed narrative after the fact.

Either WTC7 was suppose to be demolished in the dust of the demolition of the twin towers, highly likely, or another plane was to hit it. The other plane hitting WTC7 and then falling within the dust of the towers would give them great plausible deniability.