you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]horatioherbert 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

The attempted narrative as I viewed it is ZioCons orchestrated 9/11, I’m not disputing that argument. I’m augmenting the comment pointing out 1993 bombing was in fact perpetrated by Muslims and is inconvenient so ignored and dismissed with DuckDuckGo results. I don’t believe that’s an authentic response

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

The FBI set them up and framed them and gave them the explosives to do it.

https://duckduckgo.com/?q=FBI+set+up+1993+World+Trade+Center+bombing

[–]jet199 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

But even if what you say is true they still chose to drive a load of explosives into a building full of people. If that's entrapment then so is every paedophile hunter.

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Sad but true.

Further, we don't know how much was coercion vs free will. "Plant these bombs or your ma gets it," perhaps?

There are fair rules we must play by. Secret agencies are bullshit and evil through and through - intentionally.

You don't entrap people, even the evil ones. Who would turn in a briefcase full of million$? Few, but not none. Must we all live up to that standard? What if you take it, think on it, and would turn it in after a week - but they grab you in under 48 hours? Regardless entrapment is evil.

Two wrongs don't make a right - in elections or anywhere.