Actual statistical threat...

submitted by JasonCarswell from (i.imgflip.com)

all 5 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]InLaymansterms 5 insightful - 5 fun5 insightful - 4 fun6 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

But you can’t get people into a state of mass hysteria with the truth! Didn’t you hear? We’re all gonna DIE!! Put on your face mask or STOP BREATHING! Lol

[–]JasonCarswell[S] 1 insightful - 3 fun1 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Q03bS4BDrk

[–]hennaojichan 3 insightful - 5 fun3 insightful - 4 fun4 insightful - 5 fun -  (1 child)

I thought she was respondiing to a male heckler in the crowd.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

I think it was an small out call. I believe, i watched this match, even though i don't remember her name. :)

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

There is this definition: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conditional_probability .

Which strongly supports (in many ways) the argument of the meme.

Even though it could be almost impossible to prove they aren't correlated. But this is also true for the number of storks and birth numbers every year as everyone who actually did statistics, knows.

Conclusion: Almost any events can with enough effort be proven to be correlated. But almost none of these relations are causally related.

What is security without liberty worth actually ? They are undermining the liberty of citizens of many countries in the so called western world since 9/11 at the very latest.

And doing this with a security "argument" is just bs .