all 61 comments

[–]Schloss[S] 22 insightful - 7 fun22 insightful - 6 fun23 insightful - 7 fun -  (13 children)

Stripping your men of power and dignity, humiliating them, and then mass importing millions of subhumans is not a good idea.

They turned your women into hedonistic whores and they think it's funny.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Jewish_feminists

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G45WthPTo24

[–][deleted]  (11 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 13 insightful - 6 fun13 insightful - 5 fun14 insightful - 6 fun -  (8 children)

    YES THERE IS: YOUR MOTHER.

    Do you realize how much damage a feminist mother can do to a male child? I know because mine was, and she was very abusive, beating us as early as a few months of age. But just the boys. Let me tell you: no matter how strong you are, it leaves conditioning, and that's not easy to undo.

    [–]wecandobetter 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    You think mothers aren't horrible to their daughters too? Maybe we're all fucked up because our parents were narcissistic monsters, but that doesn't make us enemies.

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Oh yeah they are. Wait, did I write anything of the sort? I doubt I would have, since my own mom gave our sister, her own daughter to her boyfriend for rape and fun back when she was 10 years old.

    Are you seeking confrontation for the sake of it? Somebody said "no woman can give or take dignity or power from a man." There was no talk of girls.

    [–]Comatoast 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Please tell me that this woman is the prison system now. Any abuse of children, especially to this capacity, deserves some attempt at rehabilitation at minimum with complete removal of the option to be around children in the future. Was this a severe case of cluster B?

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

    Dunno what cluster B is, but here's the short story: my brother enjoyed sex with her as a minor, whereas I was horrified by the very idea. Actually, as far back as I can remember, and that's about 4 years old, there is only TERROR with regards to her. So anyway the brother was against legal action, and probably still is. My sister too. Classic Stockholm syndrome, I guess?

    Either way, I don't see these people anymore, so I don't know what's up with them at all. The insane old hag is still free. I keep thinking she would croak any day now, and at her funeral I'll go piss on her face in front of everybody. But that's just a fantasy. I'll probably just salt the Earth where she gets buried and keep it at that.

    One of the last things I know of her, is that her favorite boyfriend went to jail for first-degree murder. Used a kitchen knife on his wife. I met the guy, realized they were perfect for each other as he couldn't stand being in the same room as myself, and that was pretty much it.

    [–][deleted]  (3 children)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      I congratulate you on making it this far in life. With a hard start like that, it takes a strong individual to endure, and try to build a life from such a base.

      Still, a feminist mom can certainly rob a male child of dignity. Not saying he cannot ever regain it, or give it to himself, but that wasn't the statement made. ;-)

      [–][deleted]  (1 child)

      [deleted]

        [–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        There's no woman in the world that can give you power or dignity, much less strip you of it.

        Agreed.

        The converse also applies.

        Agree on the imports tho.

        There's no woman imports/people in the world that can give you power or dignity, much less strip you of it.

        It would appear you have either chosen to forfeit your dignity, or you feel the "imports" have taken it from you.

        thisfuckingguy

        I guess.

        [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

        Bingo.

        [–]AwakenGoyimEcoSlaves 14 insightful - 4 fun14 insightful - 3 fun15 insightful - 4 fun -  (10 children)

        What is this divide and conquer crap? Can't you instead direct your at (((who))) is promoting the mass immigration?

        [–]JasonCarswell 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

        Zionists.

        [–][deleted] 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

        Jews and their support crew of useful idiots.

        [–]JasonCarswell 8 insightful - 3 fun8 insightful - 2 fun9 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

        But not all Jews. There are more Christian Zionists than Jewish Zionists, however most at the top are Jewish. The rest of the Jewish population are just human shields, brainwashed just like the rest of the sheeple.

        [–]Minedwe 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

        Almost all Jews are complicit in some way but most are simply pawns as you state, only slightly above the "goy". Zio-Christians (AKA pseudo-Christians) are at the top because they are usually more relatable to the Average Joe, but are functionally identical to a Jew. Make no mistake, Judaism is on all levels just collectivist Satanism, although the degree to which it is changes. Lower level Jews are only Satanist in belief, in their ideas that Jesus is burning in Hell and that everyone else exists only as eventual slaves. Higher levels are directly Satanist by participating in hedonism and sacrifice and by putting into practice the enslavement of "goys".

        [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

        Bingo. I think you just made my friends list.

        [–]Minedwe 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        We really need to spread these facts somehow. I've always thought a pseudo-woke/feminist thing like the "Islam is right about women" or "its ok to be white" things that happened a few years back could be really effective, especially seeing the disconnect between modern wokedom and Jews.

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

        It's hard, man. The moment you start speaking out, people accuse you of being a purely bigoted moron. But to educate people who are able to receive this tidbit of enlightenment, I start with these:

        https://www.bitchute.com/video/InfoisVbVuFc/

        https://www.bitchute.com/video/SpjbobMPSa1d/

        https://www.bitchute.com/video/0I6RMclS7DEv/

        https://www.bitchute.com/video/o3kAb3Znwv6s/

        https://www.bitchute.com/video/wa1VDt4L1UEL/

        Not necessarily in this order. I'm not sure of the best sequence to offer them up in, so as to maintain interest and informational value. What do you think?

        [–]Minedwe 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Very true. But to offer those you need a "curious" person who already has suspicions and is fed up with shit and isn't into the whole anti-racism bit. But yes those videos are all very good for redpilling people. What we need though is a way to get people to that stage, a bit of eye-opening propaganda like the "Islam is right about women" thing

        [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Listen. Even anti-zionists consider us to be only fodder and slaves. Don't tell me they're not for putting the goys back "where they belong" which, in THEIR view is our being their cattle and slaves. As such, feminism for the goys would be promoted by ALL JEWS. They all agree with it, because it weakens us as a people, and serves their purpose. They are a racial group, not a religious or ideological one. That is only a secondary consideration for them, so long as it serves their ethnocentric world-domination goals.

        [–]book-of-saturday 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        All of these people are just power/money whores. Zionist or not, anyone pushing or supporting this radical ideologies are souless whores... Chinese and (traitor) Americans included.

        [–][deleted] 8 insightful - 1 fun8 insightful - 0 fun9 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

        Though I don't agree with the title, black men feel very comfortable expressing anti-white women views around me because I am black and it's ugly what they think about these girls. These men are dangerous and they need to be kept out of these countries. It's not learned behaviour. It's INNATE. White men, protect your women. You don't know what's coming...

        [–][deleted]  (20 children)

        [deleted]

          [–][deleted] 12 insightful - 1 fun12 insightful - 0 fun13 insightful - 1 fun -  (19 children)

          Ugh, striving for a decent income has more to do with having enough money on hand to escape from an abusive marriage/relationship/family than it does anything else. Often times, women with no income get trapped in a situation that is inescapable and makes them mentally ill. No man is better than one who abuses you, that's just the way it is. The same men who claim to not want "cut throat career driven women" will lord their money-making power and "dominance" over their lesser-earning wives and girlfriends, making relationships with them tortuous. Guys want women with money, but don't want these same women's money making to interfere with 24/7 domestic toil and on-the-call-sex.

          [–][deleted]  (9 children)

          [deleted]

            [–][deleted] 10 insightful - 1 fun10 insightful - 0 fun11 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

            I'm surprised, although maybe I'm thinking in terms of men seeking long-term relationships. It seems to me that the women who are poor or less-well-off are seen as social pariahs, "losers", "stupid" or "gold diggers". The women I know who have men hitting them up are nurses, managers, women with rich families, women with obvious cash coming in.

            Women who look "high maintenance" or have nice dyed/straightened hair, clear skin, perfect makeup, waxed bodies, nice clothes, gym memberships etc., often have money to burn in order to keep up those appearances. It costs more than most men think to look "porn star perfect". A good hair cut plus highlights is easily over $150 every 6 weeks, Brazilian wax $75 ever 6 weeks, gym membership $50 every month, makeup is ridiculous expensive. I'll stick with the gym at present since my job offers a discount, but most of the activities women must perform in order to appear "hot" are out of my reach.

            I know when I lived with my father and had a "nice address", I had a lot more men express interest in me. In hindsight, they thought "Daddy" would leave me some money. In reality, I wasn't his favorite, so I barely got table scraps while my older siblings had houses and cars bought for them. LOL. The appearance of having a rich parent will make people more interested in you than they'd otherwise be.

            Even then, someone like myself who earns average but less-than-ideal-wages can't afford "fun social things" like drinks and going to concerts. Women like me survive from paycheck to paycheck, this kind of eliminates women from dating. (I'm sure men fall into this predicament, too.) Most men don't want to pay, and I wouldn't expect them to do so... so I wouldn't take up an offer for an average restaurant if I knew I couldn't afford it. A lot of men have haphazard employment histories, so they will seek out women who have stable jobs with benefits over women who work as day-care assistant or check-out clerks at Wal-Mart-- at least in terms of long-term relationships.

            My views might be warped, but in my experience it pays to allow for the worst-case-scenario. I've seen way too many women trapped with horrendous spouses... and my observations started at a very young age. A woman with a meager income coming in has no way to protect herself in many places. We're talking drunks, drug users, emotional abusers, serial cheaters and most of my family is Catholic so they believe "marriage is forever", so I had to witness many of these women sink into depression, food/alcohol addiction, insanity.

            It's not much different than being a young adult child, underemployed, and trapped with abusive parents. There's no way out unless you make money, or have access to money... the longer you stay, the more your mind and spirit are destroyed from within, and the harder it becomes to leave.

            [–][deleted]  (7 children)

            [deleted]

              [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

              I think many women who might have college degrees/stable jobs will still fall into the “low income” range... Same for men. Plenty of people with the right “qualifications” aren’t self sufficient, therefor they’re deemed “poor” and not “date-able”.

              [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

              Rich family? Now we're getting into territory of what I described myself having experience with and it's a hurdle.

              Tbh, I think this is just you not wanting to put in the extra effort, which is fine btw. As a man, I agree with you. It is a hurdle.

              [–][deleted]  (3 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                Yes, I have. And yes, it is a hurdle.

                [–]wecandobetter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                It's not all juicy peaches to date a highly driven career man either. The trope of the neglected wife and family that become more and more distant and resentful of Mr Bacon-getter exists for a reason.

                [–]Dragonerne 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                That's true.

                [–]TheJamesRocket 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

                The same men who claim to not want "cut throat career driven women" will lord their money-making power and "dominance" over their lesser-earning wives and girlfriends, making relationships with them tortuous

                And that right there is the fundamental problem with modern women: You do not want to submit to your boyfriends or husbands. You want to retain power and keep your options open. You want to be able to shit test them. And then, once you get tired of your partner, or once you find a better man, you are free to leave the relationship.

                That is why society has turned into an unstable shitshow. The nature of the marriage contract has been altered beyond recognition. In the old times, when a woman wanted the status, protection, and money that came from marriage, she needed to submit to her husband. She was not allowed to 'keep her options open', because she would simply abandon her husband or cheat on him. This was ancient wisdom, something that is now called 'patriarchy' or 'misogyny.'

                Back in the old days, women were only allowed to have three different careers: They could be whores, they could be nuns, or they could be wives. It might seem cruel now, but the world was a tougher and more dangerous place back then. Society could not afford to give women lots of options, because they knew it would backfire on them. Women needed to have some skin in the game, they needed to be in it for better or worse. Because otherwise, marriage just doesn't work.

                [–]wecandobetter 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

                Sorry technology has freed up your sex-slaves *not sorry. And yes you're absolutely right. We do not want to submit to a man. Why do you deserve being 'submitted' to? When the power was all in their hands, men felt perfectly free to use that power to sleep around and mistreat their wives with full impunity. If it was such a rosebed to be under the tender hand of the male sex, why did women fight so hard to get out from under it? Yeah nah. We're not going back to the 1950s.

                [–]TheJamesRocket 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

                Sorry technology has freed up your sex-slaves *not sorry.

                The problem isn't about your characterisation of marriage as sex slavery (which just goes to show how warped your views are). The problem is that women like you want to have their cake and eat it: You want all the benefits that come with marriage without any of the sacrifices. And moreover, you want the freedom to divorce your husbands whenever you get bored, and use the government to rob him in the form of alimony.

                And yes you're absolutely right. We do not want to submit to a man.

                The institution of marriage is over 5000 years old, and can be traced back to the Sumerians. If women wanted to be provided for and protected, then they needed to submit to their husbands. That was how the contract worked. And it worked so well, in fact, that it enabled civilisation to flourish. 200 generations of women have submitted to the institution of marriage. It is only now, in the past 2 generations, that women have decided that marriage places unreasonable demands on them.

                Why do you deserve being 'submitted' to?

                Why do you deserve a man who will protect you, provide for you, and give you unconditional love (the kind that most woman are incapable of reciprocating)? Why should any man who decides to be your husband have to put up with your constant shit tests? What are you bringing to the table that would compensate for that?

                When the power was all in their hands, men felt perfectly free to use that power to sleep around and mistreat their wives with full impunity.

                That sort of thing never really happened much outside of your imagination. In the past, most of the adult population were married. There were not as many opportunitys for either men or women to cheat. There also weren't 'dating apps' that enabled random strangers to meet for casual sex.

                If it was such a rosebed to be under the tender hand of the male sex, why did women fight so hard to get out from under it?

                Because, lifelong monogamy is not really in the nature of women. They prefer serial monogamy. Women only want to be partners with a high status man, and even then only for a few years. They eventually get bored of the relationship, and look for another high status man. Marriage prevented them from pursuing this reproductive strategy. Women were forced to remain faithful to one man for life. So they were always filled with regret, wondering if they could have done better.

                Yeah nah. We're not going back to the 1950s.

                LOL, you feminists are always talking about women of the 1950s, as if this was the pinnacle of female oppression. In fact, it was nothing of the sort. Women in the 1950s were actually happier than women of today. It is the height of irony that in spite of all the 'advances' feminism has made, it has not only failed to make women any happier, but has actually made them unhappy. People continue to hold onto ideologys even though they hurt their quality of life.

                [–]not_mean_enough 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                LOL, why do you assume women with that kind of views want marriage? Marriage benefits modern women only in the countries where it provides tax cuts.

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                I mean, even women who want a traditional marriage can’t find men who want to keep up the kind of commitment that relationship requires. They also had a notorious habit of leading their original wives for trophy wives and mistresses, or simply abandoned their families “back in the good ole days”. Much of the behavior of women today is a reaction to the harsh reality that men tire of women very quickly, and think nothing of abandoning women and children so they can seek a sexual thrill elsewhere.

                [–]Hadza 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                The anti-nomial dummies will very soon learn what happens when you strip away rules that built civilization

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Yeah, well, no one wants to feel like a trapped animal in a cage. I saw too many women in my life turn into complete psychological basket cases by allowing themselves to become controlled/smothered by husbands or boyfriends. The worst among them will demand demand demand from “obedient” women until they break.

                [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                ... I should also mention that there’s no possible reason a woman should or would “submit“ to a boyfriend even if she were in a conservative culture... It’s considered taboo to sleep with/live with/take care of a boyfriend since there is no marriage contract. That’s a lose/lose situation for a woman.

                [–]fuckupaddams 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

                The uh... The who?

                [–]happysmash27 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Exactly what I am wondering.

                [–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                What does shit look like?

                [–]fuckupaddams 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                What does cum look like?

                [–]SaidOverRed 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                I wouldn't know. Bitches always insist I blow my load in'em honestly.

                [–][deleted] 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

                It's certainly anti-human to the utmost, yes.

                If you think about it, just the name "Feminist" means pro-woman. Pro-woman at the expense of whom? Men obviously because there aren't any other kind of humans: there are men and there are women.

                It's pure divide and conquer. The way forward for people is in the union of man and woman.

                [–]Dragonerne 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

                I am pro-woman. At the expense of who? Men.

                Why?

                Only the absolute alpha race of men can afford to be pro-woman at the expense of men, because if men of weak races would be pro-women, they would lose access to their women who would pick the alpha race of men instead.
                White women want white men. Brown women want white men. Yellow women want white men. Jewish women want white men. Latino women want white men. Indian women want white men.
                White men being pro-women is an evolutionary strategy.

                The female hatred we see of white men on social media comes from sexual frustration. Often the most anti-white women you'll find on social media date white men themselves. They're angry at white men because they feel rejected by white men.

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Very well put, indeed.

                [–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (1 child)

                Does being a feminophile make me a feminist?

                [–]jet199 6 insightful - 7 fun6 insightful - 6 fun7 insightful - 7 fun -  (0 children)

                Does being a zoophile make you an animal welfare campaigner?

                [–]Honestanonymous 4 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 3 fun -  (8 children)

                The.....shitskins??

                [–][deleted] 9 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 0 fun10 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

                Derogatory term for people who are not white. As much as I disapprove of miscegenation, that term is needlessly derogatory. There are worthwhile individuals in all human ethnic groups.

                [–]LesbianOutlaw 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

                Cumskins are an overrated ethnic group. The East Asians have proven themselves to be just as intelligent if not more so than whites. The white countries pale in comparison to Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan. Any random little town in Japan is going to be nicer than Hicksville, West Virginia with a 99% white population.

                White supremacists are dipshits. There’s plenty of garbage genetic material in the Caucasian gene pool.

                [–][deleted] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Each ethnic group has its strengths: Blacks are good at sports and physical things, Asians are good at manufacturing, Whites are good at inventing / innovation, Jews are good at stealing, spying and subverting. And so on.

                Recognizing the relative strengths and weaknesses of each nationality / ethnicity / racial group is key to harmony. With this recognition, single-ethnicity nations can arise, with each its own specialization and huge economic and other advantages, for the betterment of mankind, can be achieved. There is no downside to this.

                This study of ethnic specialties is called "classical racism" and has nothing to do with racial prejudice and even less with XYZ supremacy. And I see that you are a fellow student of this discipline, even though you also use derogatory terms, like the racially prejudiced people.

                [–]Hadza 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                You’re irrelevant and your attempts at insults toothless

                [–]LesbianOutlaw 2 insightful - 3 fun2 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 3 fun -  (0 children)

                Aww, is the birdshitskin triggered? Fuck on outta here. You are a pawn of the Jew and your race will continue to be cucked into non-existence by the shitskins. So superior.

                [–]Sixto 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Cumskins are an overrated ethnic group. The East Asians have proven themselves to be just as intelligent if not more so than whites. The white countries pale in comparison to Japan, South Korea, Singapore, Taiwan. Any random little town in Japan is going to be nicer than Hicksville, West Virginia with a 99% white population.

                The difference between the races doesn't make anybody pale in comparison when it comes to intellect, the lowest scoring group is not fundamentally on a different level than the highest scoring group.

                Any random little town in Japan is going to be nicer than Hicksville, West Virginia with a 99% white population.

                Niceness isn't governed by intelligence nor whiteness.

                White supremacists are dipshits. There’s plenty of garbage genetic material in the Caucasian gene pool.

                Sure, but I judge a group on their cultural behaviour rather than their genetic average intelligence. A lot of differences turns up and I find that not killing homosexuals is superior to killing homosexuals as a somewhat extreme example.

                Cumskins

                I like that. But I'd say I'm more pink than greyish white... So perhaps Agressiveanalsexcumfrothskins?

                [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Why do you hate us PoC (People of Cumskin)?

                [–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                [–]SaidOverRed 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Found not guilty because she didn't try to stop them. Them: "If you resist us we will kill you."

                [–]LesbianOutlaw 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                You know that bird shit is white, right OP? You’re a shitskin too.

                [–]Sixto 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Oh come on, you can do better than that - You got to try harder!

                [–]dazedandsubdued 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                i don't know what any of this has to do with feminism. do you know what feminism is?

                [–]testu_nagouchi 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

                Eyebrow lady is perfect for memes.

                [–]kokolokoNightcrawler 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

                Her teeth are British in every second shot