What SaidIt Considers Insightful

submitted by CompleteDoubterII from i.imgur.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Zahn 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

Quit taking my vernacular ya shameless loquacious swindler. Use your other brain cell to figure out your own.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

Back for more, eh?

The sophists are as old as ancient Greece, so you have no right to claim a monopoly on low-budget philosophy.

The sophists were the amoral in their philosophical musings and are the basic equivalent of modern corporate lawyers. Shameless scum bags.

The word is an accurate label, and you have earned your title.

You abruptly appeared in a chat to try to rescue your co-conspirator /s/Penelope from a savage beating.
I recall laughing out loud when i read your first question which ended with "no sophistry".

Honest thinkers wouldn't debase themselves with sophistry, and that was in the forefront of your mind, so I had you pegged.

Ah, good times.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Honest thinkers wouldn't debase themselves with sophistry, and that was in the forefront of your mind, so I had you pegged.

You have provided no examples of sophistry (as usual) other than your own sophistry. It would follow then with your demonstration of sophistry that no honest thinker would debase themselves with implying being pegged, and that was at the forefront of your mind. By your logic, then it demonstrates you enjoy being pegged.

You're an absolute windbag. I'm neutral on your "problem" with Chipit, but your obsession with it and senseless attacks on anyone who variates from your hand woven narrative, makes your story circumspect to suspicion and reflection.

Tom the bloviater, pegs himself....again

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You have provided no examples of sophistry

You're apparently sensitive to the sophistry label. I wonder why that is. Put down the thesaurus (because you are trying too hard) and look in your own chat history for our first exchange. This will likely be a painful memory, but if you confront it then maybe you'll get over it.

This is boring, and I don't really care.

Bye. ;-)

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I accept your surrender.

You always say I'm being a Sophist, but never present proof. As had been said before, I agree with you on a lot of levels, minus your white knighting Muslims, and more recently pit bulls, as well as pointlessly harassing members.

But, other than that I have no real qualms. So if you feel I'm using Sophistry to shill something, please present substance instead of your blustery slanderous opinion.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is boring, and I don't really care.

[–]Zahn 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

don't really

Then go harass some other members instead.