you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]magnora7[S] 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (3 children)

Or, you know, populations naturally stop growing fast once countries develop, like every country in world history basically.

[–][deleted] 8 insightful - 7 fun8 insightful - 6 fun9 insightful - 7 fun -  (2 children)

Believing that anything in the socio-economic-political realm is in any way "natural" is to discount the presence of the subhuman parasites. As such, I am ready to concede that this SEEMS TO happen naturally, but that, at the same time, accounting for (((their))) influence on this aspect of civilization is near impossible.

For example, in my country (Canada) debt has been surging since 1980. It follows that the burden of said debt would show very much in these 1970 vs 2014 stats. But HOW MUCH does debt account for? Hell if I know. And then you have newish messages such as "to have children is environmentally irresponsible", which has the same origin as the growth of debt. Bottom line, nothing is certain.

[–]FediNetizen 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

Believing that anything in the socio-economic-political realm is in any way "natural" is to discount the presence of the subhuman parasites.

You mean that in every country in the world, there are subhuman parasites that are conspiring to lower the birth rate of the country in question as its GDP per capita increases? Because this is such a well-established trend that you can plot the fertility rates and GDP per capita of every country in the world for as far back as the data goes and see a pretty goddamn clear trend.

By the way, this relationship is old news, but you're so steeped in anti-semitism and conspiracy theories that you just attribute every trend you don't like to (((((((((((them))))))))))) even when that explanation makes no sense. Why don't you take the blinders off and join the rest of us in reality.