all 4 comments

[–]Tiwaking 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The slave driving, sociopath ruled, expansionist and war mongering Soviet Empire was feared and despised by everyone in a Europe and with good reason.

Its funny right? Nothing good came out of the Soviet Union. I was trying to think of something, anything but nope. You could say Chess improved a lot in the Soviet Union. Thats not really worth decades of fear, uncertainty, and doubt though.

[–]Canbot 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

They made it to space first. I bet you would claim that a lot of great things came from the US space program. The soviet one was just as advanced, if not more. What you have to realize, and not just admit in a hand wavy fashion, is that all the information that you have access to is filtered by propagandists. You are not taught history by a benevolent third party. You are taught by propagandists who want you to think, behave, and believe in ways that benefits them. All scientific advancements push humanity forward, even soviet ones. And even if YOU were never taught about them, you can't deny that they went to space first. And that alone proves there was something there.

[–]Tiwaking 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

They made it to space first

They also had Trofim Lysenko in charge of agriculture. India has space program, but has Designated Shitting Streets. China gets $100 Billion for Climate Change, but has rovers on the moon.
This is why I mentioned Chess. Chess was considered the battleground of the mind. Space isnt. Space demonstrates technological advancement as much as a Nuclear Bomb demonstrates World Peace.

[–]BravoVictor 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I didn't know there were apologetics for the Red Army. Does Russia even have a "Red Army" anymore? I thought that branding died with the USSR and Russian communism?

The truth is simply that Russians were mostly bad people produced by a bad society

I doubt this very much. In most revolutions, the people doing the revolting are usually not the majority of the people. In the US revolution, it's said only 45% of the population supported the revolution and only 1/3 actively fought the British. The the majority were either indifferent or supportive of the status quo. I suspect something similar is true about the Russian revolution against the Czar. Most people are just trying to live their lives.