all 20 comments

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (23 children)

John Jacob Astor was probably murdered by J P Morgan on the Titanic. He was probably murdered because he strongly opposed the creation of the FED. He wasn't a good guy, but an enemy of the enemy, etc.

JP had made a huge production of loading valuable artwork onto the Titanic for it's maiden voyage. So Astor assumed it was safe, because JP was aboard. Astor was on the ship and was curiously absent, when the ship was being abandoned (the robber barons almost all survived. JP showed up in France 3 days later with his mistress, and all of his artwork. Seemingly oblivious. Oops...

Also, the Titanic that sunk was likely a refurbished Olympia (it's sister ship), which had been damaged on it's maiden voyage.

The # of windows on the front of the ships are the tell tale hints of the real backstory, as they couldn't make major changes in the available time period.

IIRC some British port corporation would have gone bankrupt if they had to cover the cost of the Olympia, so it was insurance fraud with additional nefarious benefits.
The congressional investigation was a cover up. I don't think that there was a proper British investigation.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I had heard of Jesuit involvement, but forgot the details. I don't think I realized the significance of their order at the time. I'm pretty sure you informed me of this. Thanks again bro! 👍

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

happy to be useful :-)

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The Captain was also an alleged Jesuit.
THE SINKING OF THE TITANIC 1912.

The Jesuits and a group of US financiers supposedly plotted the sinking in order to do away with certain enemies to their scheme to set the Federal Reserve. These included Benjamin Guggenheim, Isador Strauss and John Jacob Astor who all perished on the Titanic.

...

According to the theory, Browne was the “Jesuit Master” of Captain Edward Smith, also in on the plot, and commanded him to sink the ship by driving it into an iceberg. Browne had been invited to remain on the ship to New York as the guest of some American passengers. His request for permission was met by a telegram saying GET OFF THAT SHIP –PROVINCIAL.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

right. they will sacrifice themselves

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

A lot of the Oceanic crew would not sail aboard the broken vessel renamed Titanic. Perhaps because of this there were several strange new recruits. (Assassins?) The captain was likely executed as punishment, as were the billionaires and their servants.

Suicide? Doubtful.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Totally verifiable.

== The Titanic mythology in a simplified nutshell ==

Suffering from two three collisions, the RMS Olympic, over one weekend (March 2-3, 1912) in Liverpool switched names, life preservers, and lifeboats with it’s near identical sister ship, the RMS Titanic, sunk on April 14, 1912, in an insurance scam while providing cover for the disappearance of 3 billionaires, Astor, Guggenheim, and Straus – despite most rich passengers being the first saved. Curiously J. P. Morgan, who controlled the White Star Line’s parent corporation, the International Mercantile Marine Co., conveniently pulled off valuable statues in the last hour and cancelled his voyage due to “illness”, yet was healthy with his mistress on a French beach over the following week. The “missing” billionaires fortunes came by physical products (ie. practical goods, fashion, furs, hotelier, technology, etc) rather than virtual means (ie. debt usury, stock speculation, etc) and their absence may have smoothed the way for the 16th income tax amendment adopted on February 3, 1913, followed by the Federal Reserve System in the act passed awkwardly on December 23, 1913, laying the tracks to the “Great” World War I and its pre-planned sequel World War II (designed to profit from chaos and population control from mass trauma). The nearby suspiciously idle SS Californian sat empty (except for 3,000 life jackets and 3,000 blankets) in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean but tragically missed the rescue signal flares. Naturally blame was misplaced, scapegoats were outcast, and secrets remained secured.

Reworked from my comments here: https://www.corbettreport.com/the-wwi-conspiracy/#comment-56806

See also:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._P._Morgan

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_Star_Line

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Olympic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Titanic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMHS_Britannic

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RMS_Titanic_alternative_theories

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SS_Californian

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jacob_Astor_IV

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benjamin_Guggenheim

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isidor_Straus & https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ida_Straus

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sixteenth_Amendment_to_the_United_States_Constitution

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve_Act

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federal_Reserve

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G._Edward_Griffin#The_Creature_from_Jekyll_Island

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jekyll_Island_Club

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

== The Titanic Conspiracy in MSM and alt-media ==

I'd been a 9/11 skeptic since day one and a truther since 2004, but in 2015 to find better solutions than the disappointing MSM lame-but-pretty documentaries I really began delving hard into alt-media for deeper alt-histories with superior contextualization and comprehension so I've been consuming as many new-to-me conspiracy theories as I could, including (initially) some of the ridiculous ones. Since 2015 when I discovered this Titanic theory a LOT of new videos have sprung up too : https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=titanic+conspiracy I can't speak to them as I haven't seen most of them.

I think, more importantly than sifting through the vast variety of videos is a comparison between a high-budget corporate SkyTV [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skytv] production for the mass UK audience and a lower-budget self-funded independent production that will never see broadcast air-time.

Watch the independent documentary : "The Best Titanic Conspiracy Documentary (2012)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOeIdDXN8SM

Then watch the SkyTV documentary that includes further good details yet manages to omit very easily obtainable critical information obfuscating a clear resolution to the "mystery" : "Was the Titanic Sunk? : Documentary on the Titanic Conspiracy (Full Documentary)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dXlavl7Hc4o

Regarding the end of this corporate "conspiracy debunking" video... I want to see more than a quick glimpse of the wreckage to know that I'm looking at the flat front of the Titanic wheelhouse and not the flat back wall of the Olympic wheelhouse. Dwelling on some details and flashing by others is a common propaganda trick to bias viewers to steer the narrative, manipulate minds, and manufacture consent for their social engineering goals. I can't speak to the authenticity of what Paddy is alleged to have claimed or not claimed as I haven't researched it nor did they provide citations, recordings, or anything but "he said" and we're to trust the media because they never intentionally lie. Ever.

The modern corporate media bait and switch about the vintage corporate marine bait and switch insurance scam.

Is any of this true or false? I can't say with any 100% certainty. Do the media ever lie? Over and over again. Do governments and corporations ever lie? Over and over again. What does this prove? Nothing by itself. But when it's added together with example after example, many connected, and many connected in less-than-obvious ways one may start to grasp a bigger picture and ulterior agendas behind deceptive narratives.

If I flip a coin there's a 50/50 chance it will land heads. To get heads twice is a 25% chance. To get head 3 times = 12.5% chance. 4 times = 6.25% chance. And so on. After a while you might say the chances are pretty slim, or you might say that it's a double headed coin or that it's rigged somehow. Just as in gambling "the house always wins", so too in life the corporatocracy always wins - until we can point out how they cheat us.

To say anyone would intentionally sink a huge ship with people on board is like saying someone would intentionally burn or collapse a skyscraper with people in it. (I would list all the examples of these historical to modern events but it diverges from my main point, is too big a task, and I just ate and need a nap.)

See also:

More good videos in this "Titanic Conspiracy" playlist : https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLpODz2ZE55fD8I_NOA9LhLs6d5znyQFqS

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manufacturing_Consent_(disambiguation)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Noble_lie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Propaganda

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_engineering_(disambiguation)

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Ping /u/Tom_Bombadil /u/useless_aether because you guys commented on this I thought you might dig this new paragraph above. The other reason I wrote it will soon be unveiled.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Thanks for the link to the playlists. This one was particularly interesting.

The Titanic Conspiracy - The Great Deception {John Hamer}

It's interesting how he makes the case that no passengers reported seeing an iceberg hit the ship, and only two crew members reported seeing it.
However, some witnesses did report seeing a ship leaving the scene. Some witnesses claimed that an icebreaker ship intentionally crashed into the ship; creating a 6 inch wide gash for over 300 feet.

You should post the link to this presentation. Maybe watch the last 20 mins for the Q&A refresher. Interesting stuff.

[–]JasonCarswell 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'd never considered this much.

This brings to mind a side story that helps confirm the "official" narrative... After the Titanic sank they found the villainous iceberg because they found some tea cups on it as proof. I always thought that was a strange thing to find. Perhaps this is true or a concocted story. The Titanic china was the same as all other White Star Line china.

There's also the story of snowball fights on deck, allegedly scraped off the iceberg. In freezing temperatures snow could be made by frost and/or the bow's ocean spray collecting on deck. But who can know what's true anymore.

I think you just posted it. That's a great lecture. It's in that playlist. There's a lot in that playlist. But the idea is to keep the "lessons" as short as possible.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Nice! That is close to how I remembered the story. I reald about it in the pre-Corbett era, so the source was not as rigerous, and therefore somewhat questionable.
I hadn't heard about the other two billionaires, though. Thanks for the info.

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Don't get me confused. JAMES CORBETT DID NOT REPORT THAT. That was me quoting myself in his comment section.

I was complaining because he hadn't yet (to my knowledge) reported on the "Titanic Conspiracy" and it'd be a really easy piece to do with abundant evidence, as would explaining the Holocaust exaggeration myth for exploitation. Not only would these be easy to do, they would be VERY impactful examples (if done properly) by illustrating that common "truths" we all believe are often exaggerations, myths, or utter fiction perpetuated in the media echo chamber. "I'm the king of the world!" will never be the same.

I wrote an article about James Corbett on Wikipedia. It was censored as were some of my other efforts and I was banned from WP for a year for being "another polite truther". I pasted that article on RationalWiki (who aren't very rational) before it landed at InfoGalactic ( https://infogalactic.com/info/James_Corbett_(journalist) ). IG is mostly alt-right but I'm anarcho-progressive trutherist and as long as I'm not censored I'm happy and they leave me alone. Very alone. There's virtually no community there. I really don't get it but I like the deep wiki. Anyways, a couple years ago the Washington Post did an article about Prop-Or-Not, a shady psy-op website, likely CIA or Mossad, who declare who's fake news, and while WaPo didn't directly acknowledge The Corbett Report (which might have actually granted him a foot into a place on WP) the Prop-Or-Not actually had a list of "fake news" including reference to my now-corrupted RationalWiki article on James. So JC read my article and liked it during one show. So I said hey, that's my shit. He said, kewl have a membership. I don't have enough time to read a fraction of what goes on in his community but they're pretty groovy. Occasionally I make a comment when moved to.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

https://infogalactic.com/info/James_Corbett_(journalist)

hey i just read that page a day ago when someone on voat asked if there is any dirt on james corbett. he was suspicious because he is making a lot of sense :-)

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Criticisms : https://infogalactic.com/info/James_Corbett_(journalist)#Criticisms

Also I think he sounds funny and looks like this : https://infogalactic.com/info/File:James_Corbett_Bearded_Sketch_Cleaned_v3_-_Thumb_400x400.png

His videos are B+ production quality, sometimes A. He could really reach way more if he either applied a sense of humour and/or hired someone to punch up his content. He justifiably got in a feud with Sibel Edmonds. Tom Secker doesn't like JC though he wouldn't tell me why. Also, Corbett is not an atheist, though is agnostic but claims some spirituality. He's into Japanese chicks, or married one anyway. He's from Calgary. I don't know if this is even decent criticism.

No dirt on James.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

well, trinity college in dublin might be too elitist for my taste and who knows if they have secret societies like yale..

[–]JasonCarswell 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The Lucky Charm School Secret Society. Tobesure tobesure.

[–][deleted]  (4 children)

[deleted]

    [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

    On what? that he opposed the Fed, and miraculously died in the Titanic when most of the wealthy passengers survived. IIRC he was personally invited by Morgan.

    Morgan made a spectacle of his own arrival clearly intended to make his presence known, and then discreetly disembarked with his property.

    Astor was an industrialist, who represented a significant portion of the manufacturing faction of the economy; back in a time when manufacturing dominated the US interested.

    Before the Fed coup.

    [–][deleted]  (2 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      That's not something that I've really investigated.

      Here's a link which briefly mentions the murder of three prominent industrialist and their opposition.

      https://theconspiracyblog.com/conspiracies/u-s-government/federal-reserve-treasury-dept/534-the-titanic-was-sunk-deliberately-to-create-the-federal-reserve

      MURDERING THE OPPOSITION

      The Federal Reserve did have some opposition. Three of the richest and most important of the opponents were Benjamin Guggenheim, Isador Strauss, the head of Macy’s Department Stores, and John Jacob Astor, probably the wealthiest man in the world. Their total wealth, at that time, using dollar values of their day was more than 500 million dollars. Today that amount of money would be worth nearly eleven billion dollars.

      These three men were coaxed and encouraged to board the floating palace. They had to be destroyed because the Jesuits knew these men would use their wealth and influence to oppose a Federal Reserve Bank as well as the various wars that were being planned.

      I haven't delved deeply into the pre-FED monetary politics.