you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]hajamieli 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Your article does not support your claim, quite the opposite. Did you even read the abstract? Previous estimates was that the Maori population wouldn't have exceeded 5000 before they exterminated the Moa, whereas this study shows it'd have been earlier and by just 2000 or fewer Maori.

[–]iraelmossadreddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

I was not using the article to support my claim.

[–]hajamieli 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Then what supports your claim? It seems to directly contradict what experts say about it and you've not presented anything to support it.

[–]iraelmossadreddit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

repeated history of british fucking shit up and lying about it changing history...

[–]hajamieli 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

In other words, you're pulling crackpot theories straight out of your ass backed by nothing but your shit.