you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DualitySquared 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

You're just as bad as they are.

Saggy tits is just an appeal to vanity. Breastfeeding doesn't really impact it either way.

Nutritionally, the formula is often just as good. Now the psychological implications... Who knows?

Many mothers pump, so there's the lack of nipple time there, too. Plus it's not fresh, possibly reheated poorly.... Honestly, old tit juice can be worse than formula, buddy.

So maybe stop arguing with other dip shits on the internet.

It's a multifaceted issue with no clear answer.

Some women have problems lactating sufficiently.

Others drink or eat or smoke, etc. Not good for breast milk!

And that smoking is a definite tit sagger and boner killer.

Public breast feeding is probably not coming back into style anytime soon. And without that, it's just not going to happen as often as it probably should.

But your major fuck up is this is a moral argument. It's prescriptive. You should... You ought to....

Then you focus on the dumbest factor of all. Saggy tits...

Get a fucking life.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nutritionally, the formula is often just as good.

Unfortunately, this isn't the case. The problem is 99% if research in this area is paid for by the formula manufacturers.

Breast milk is 1000% more developmentally beneficial. Breast milk includes antibodies, bacteria for digestive development. The skin contact boosts the growth of healthy skin bacteria on the baby's skin form the mother. Formula isn't even milk.

There are innumerable benefits from breast feeding. The corporate Heath care system profits from a sick, immunocompromised, overvaccinated, health deprived public.

The industries advocating for formula is a crime against children and humanity.

[–]DualitySquared 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And when bottled, refrigerated, and reheated? What then?

You have this crazy idea that a modern career oriented woman has time to literally breastfeed a baby for two years? You're delusional.

And if the mother isn't eating healthy, smokes, drinks (from caffeine to booze), or does drugs?

When the mother can't produce enough milk?

Formula is a God send to many children that would simply go without!

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you suggesting that formula is as good as milk?

If babies will starve without formula then fine. Mothers milk whenever possible.

The effort is well worth it, and will literally last a lifetime.

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

No way, formula is not nearly as good as milk.

[–]Snow 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sigh...

Incoming!!!

But your major fuck up is this is a moral argument. It's prescriptive. You should... You ought to....

I didn't say they should breastfeeding or not, they can keep doing want they want to do. I am keeping posting my "illness list" for freedom of speech. And waiting for their child suffering one or more than one of those kinds of illness, found out my post through internet. That's why they are using different ways to make others delete these posts.

It's you and them going to mad for this, I found this is enjoyable.

[–]DualitySquared 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You call them evil....

Lol. Turd.