This is a human rights violation; a non-starter

Some priests say getting a divorce is a sin. Your priest says failing to grant people divorces is a sin. Except you call your priest a lawyer and your call your sin a “human rights violation”. From a legal point of view marriage is a contract. Why is it a human rights violation to hold someone to a contract? This is just your religious belief.

Divorce regimes are polygamous societies from an anthropological perspective. The problem with polygamous societies it that they promote genetic traits like high violence, high sexual agression, strict control over female sexuality (generally), lack of paternal care toward offspring, and lack of egalitarianism. Genetically.

People dont understand how evolution works. They believe societies develop cultural traits “accidentally” or randomly. But it is because of different environmental constraints that cultures vary from country to country. Monogamy/Polygamy systems are a key force in the evolution of human societies. High violence and high greed are traits that make polygamists very successful so they are more frequent in polygamous societies. The US and Europe were strictly monogamous cultures until the last 100 years or so. Weve now switched over to a polygamous system. The result will be higher levels of violence and rape and lower egalitarianism. Because the population is changing genetically. There has been a fair amount of research done on this subject.

I am not sure this is necessary, as the tax would be based on income.

Its necessary to reduce the workforce. Remember how I said you have to reduce the labor supply? This is how you do it.

Workers agree that half of them will quit their jobs and stay home, theoretically the wages will double because labor becomes scarce and expensive. So worker will make 2x the money. But they have to share their $$ with the workers that have agreed to stay home. So we have to create an institution in which the workers with the $$ give half of it to the folks that stayed home. Oh wait, we already have one, its called marriage.

Hey why have wages steadily declined since the 1950s ? Its like a total mystery

Its not a mystery. If workers agree to stay married and share one income between the two of them, they will have roughly the same income as before but will only have to work half as much on average. So you want to encourage workers to follow this rule and not be scabs. You only tax two income households who are breaking ranks. Otherwise, no taxes for working people. Taxes are not good. They are really only useful as a punishment. We are taxing way too much and its leading to corruption of the people who get to spend the taxes.

This is another oversimplification and does not support your approach to limiting the available labor.

Not true. I want to increase the ratio of $$/hrs worked (for the bottom 95%,) per person. I dont want to reduce the number of people.

but the world is overpopulated. Reducing the population is good.

Some people in the world have ancestors that evolved in cold climates. Those people evolved (genetically) more risk averse strategies for surviving long harsh winters with low food supply, such as fewer children. Other groups evolved in warmer climates with higher food supply year round but also higher competition from other people. They evolved more risk taking strategies including higher number of offspring. Higher rates of polygamy. These are gene based behaviors that were determine by environments over thousands of years.

People who evolved in cold climates do not have an overpopulation problem. They have an underpopulation problem. They typically have to work too hard and too long to save money to marry and have children. Beause they are genetically risk averse. That is the burden that the corrupt wealth stealing bureacracy is putting on them. These people have a right to have children.

People whose ancestry evolve in hot climates have an overpopulation problem. It is not their fault and they are not choosing it. It is a natural behavior that is typical to them. They have a more risk taking strategy They have more resources and more medical care and so more of their children are surviving childhood. They need to modify their reproductive behavior to meet their economic capabilties. They need to work it out for themselves and the World Bank, the UN, the IMF and other billionaire orgs need to stay the fuck out of their countries and stop socially engineering them. This is colonialism.

However. In north america and europe you have a lot of people from more risk averse groups who are working harder and harder to earn less and less and pay more and more taxes, and those taxes are spent on groups with high numbers of children who cannot afford to care for them. People with a risky strategy (having a lot of kids when you are young and poor) are appropriating money from people with more risk averse strategies. This is unfair. These are two groups that are not playing by the same set of rules. The people who are putting off child bearing are being harmed. You cannot take advantage of a groups natural behaviors to steal from them. No one should be required to forego reproduction to pay for someone else to replace them who is more reckless. This is a human rights violation in my book. You are using the bureacracy to annihilate entire races. Thats not really what its meant to do.

The bureacracy is appropriating from people who are reproducing infrequently and redistributing that wealth to people who are reproducing more frequently. This is why you have an overpopulation problem. People have not adjusted their behavior. The bureacracy is encouraging them not to.

All of the solutions you mention would require government intervention, which requires political activitism,

No. Just cut off their money. Once you take away the trillion dollars they get to play with every year, they will do what you want to get it back. That is what most right wing people have been saying all along while left wing people advocate taking more and more $$ from working people and giving it to bureacrats

The 1% (and Republicans) will not help you. The party and politician that supports the 99% will help.

You mean that right and left workers do not agree on the solution. Right wing people are plenty politically active. I think you mean that they dont protest and riot too much and when they do antifa usually show up and beat them bloody becuase you know, some guy who drives a pickup truck and works for a living (unlike most antifa rioters) is the real enemy.

The right wing wants to completely dismember wall street. Not even the magatard boomers will fight you on that one. The question is, when is the left going to realize the the government bureacracy are not good guys, they are corrupt, they hate the people, they produce nothing and are part of the problem? Bureacracy is bureacracy. Governement is not magic.

This racial justice stuff and all the BLM rioting is just a side show. Paid for by billionaires who want to distract from the real problem, billionaires. So they have convinced gullible college students that the real problem is some dude in arkansas who makes $20 an hour and lives in a mobile home. I mean that is dumb. The billionaires, and all the corporate entities btw, are leftists, and pushing progressive left wing propaganda. Maybe if all the billionaires, and all the corporations and all the people in the political bureacracy are leftists and democrats, maybe its not really a rebellion. Maybe its a carefully staged psyop marketed to teenagers who dont understand how the world works?

Ive discussed CO2 AGW earlier (aka man made climate change). If youve studied the biologic or geologic history of the earth, you understand that climate change is always ongoing. When the pyramids were built in Egypt, the Sahara desert was covered in grass and trees. Thats how fast the climate changes, all the time. They have brain washed people who dont understand the physics, that any observable change in regional or global climates is evidence of a world wide pending catastrophe and BILLIONAIRES and their puppets in government are pushing this to have greater control over the world energy sector. Its fake. Weather changes. Thats what it does.

Limiting pollution to the environment and increasing efficiency are things I am all for.

They have impressive strategies for getting in the news and calling attention to themselves and the cause.

Because its all a show. Theres no substance. The purpose is to brain wash people in to a hysteria, not to educate them on the science. You are so committed but you didnt even know what I meant by AGW.

When you allow a small number of billionaires to hoard all the fossil fuels on earth, you will put the world economy back to 1800s economic capabilities. The civilization of the 1800s cannot not support 8 billion people. Every industry that uses oil will retract. The poorest people will be hit the hardest. You have no idea what will happen when you turn out all the lights and shut off everyones furnaces. The power fiasco in Texas, rolling black outs, these are the start. It is caused by trying to implement green energy technologies that are not advanced enough to support power consumption. The battery technology required for power stability is not there. It is 50 years away. You will be killing poor people. This is what XR wants to do, yes? Just cut off all the carbon fossil fuel and we’ll see how it goes? They dont understand climate physics, they dont understand economics, they dont understand energy production. They are useful idiots subsidized by the elite. You think you’re on the side the little people but you’re not.