Socialism vs Capitalism

submitted by [deleted] from jssocial.pw

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]FreedomUltd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

You stop spreading lies.

Millions of working Americans don’t know where their next meal is coming from. ... One-sixth of Americans don’t have enough food to eat.

[–]Canbot 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

Just because someone makes a claim on the internet does not mean it's true. Literally the first paragraph starts off talking about a 3 year old who refuses to eat the free meal he gets at school. I don't have the patients to go through all that garbage on a website that is so incredibly buggy it won't scroll. It's propaganda. When they are telling you these people are starving and tell a story about how the kids refuse to eat free food and then go on and on about bills but tell you nothing about income you have to be intelligent enough to realize they are bullshitting you.

America has welfare programs. You can get free food if you can't find a job. People on welfare are disproportionately FATTER than the general population. They have nothing to do all day but eat free food. America does not have a food problem, or an income problem, it has a "people too stupid to eat healthy" problem.

[–]FreedomUltd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Yeah see the thing is, you are nothing but some person on the internet spewing bullshit.

That "buggy site" is National Geographic.

And they've addressed the poor / obese issue extensively.

[–]Canbot 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

This is what is called the appeal to authority fallacy. You will deny all logic and facts that contradict your programming and claim any lie told by an authority figure must be true simply because they are the authority. That is stupid.

I am making logical points, I am refuting that article based on content in that article. You literally can't point to anything I said as being wrong or illogical and still demand that I must be wrong, and the clearly bullshit article (as I have already shown) must be right because National Geographic is an authority.

Never mind that they are literally a nature magazine who became famous for pictures of animals, is run by leftists, and can't claim any knowledge about economics or social science.

[–]FreedomUltd 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Do you actually do fool anyone by claiming to be logical?

I'm well familiar with the tactic of waving off any source anyone can produce, and relying instead on what you pull from your own ass. It's where you people live.

The fact remains, I've produced one source, and you've produced Jack shit.

You read the first paragraph and found that a kid didn't eat a breakfast that was available to him, and his mom struggled to feed him when he was hungry later. It's your own fault that you don't recognize them as people who don't have enough food. That's not being logical, it's being in denial of anything that doesn't agree with your world view, which you have yet to support with anything. And frankly, it's being a real cunt. But again, it's where you people live.