Ohh I've got fax! But why would I bother showing them to you when you are going to keep disputing them on a different basis in an attempt to expand your biased irrational hysteria anyway?

Any facts that I throw at you like this, or this, or this, or this would just be met with the ridicule of your irrational hysteria. Those sources would suffice to prove the thesis I stated earlier.

But

I'll do something different this time, I'll argue from your perspective since you want to undermine the need for rational explanations :-)

"Lets see here... hmm.. ohh yes, I'm /u/useless_aether. Anti-commie supreme!

ZOMG the commies are coming! Got those videos here and whatnot, its some supplementary old stuff and whatnot. A bunch of old people that spoke to audiences before the influx of new information on the internet, scaring the west with their doom prophecies of the old ways in the red! Lets see again.. how should I argue this point?

Keep regurgitating and post links in the wild as I typically do? I will, but I shouldn't! So instead I'll argue it from the macroscopic perspective of updated objectivity!

Lets see, here is an older but reliable source suggesting that perceptions of communism as in older models governance may be increasing (along with nationalism), due to the contrasting perception of capitalism being inefficient for some of the developments that have occurred. Is it an objective physical barometer reflecting accuracy? Not really, but the survey is an objective study on an increasing trend of people reverting mentalities due to the growing dissatisfaction of an aging capitalistic system. Is that enough enough to mandate or alter state policy?

Nope.

Leftist/communist and even nazi parties may still exist and have their own reactionary information bubbles, contacts and networks to do their bidding, however; the methodologies governing state policies will still have to be without biases or predispositions to extreme ideologies.

Russia itself refuses to follow suit and return back to those old days of communism. Henceforth, the real problem seems to be a bunch of industries and trolls that can't move away from their biases in behavior of shit-posting that are in-fact attempting to subvert, what should be a pragmatic humanist process with updated methodologies and expanded sets of data.

Hence-forth they are doomed to fail! Just like your simple minded reactionary postings.