Lets take a look at it:

Follows: Jordan Peterson (academic), Joe Rogan (podcaster) I really don't see what's wrong with them. You don't need to agree with Jordan Peterson on many of his points but I hardly see it as an issue, and Joe Rogan mostly sits there and listens to people who are invited (hence the backlash when the CEO went there and wasn't seriously questioned).

Only hobby:

Gaming? Games and rock roll bad!!! For someone who points the finger at others for following Trump is basically taking the same stance as Trump in regards to video games. Probably better that having the hobby of troll posts on social media like OP just did.

Only concerned with:

Crime stats? That's an objective was of assessing a problem, using stats IS BEING rational. Rationality is evil.

Will then review bomb said media as protest:

This is one is very wrong considering the example presented, it breaks down what the purpose of film critics.

The purpose of critics should be informing people if a movie/series is worth their time and money. If the viewers score differs significantly from critics, it's not the viewers that are wrong it's the critics. I'd say it's a matter of statistics, large samples vs small samples, but OP already expressed a dislike about statistics so..