culture in transition space illustration of fringe, network style
Let's have some fun with words to help us understand the conflicts societies find themselves engaged in today. Before the start, an apology; I find more freedom and fun with a population of ideas (list) than a chosen/frozen result, but when Internet searches are highly biased toward a contrary approach, I must choose one or a few items to convey the intended idea. Readers object, they want simple, quick reads, especially images. If you are one like that, I suggest you avoid my postings; these are for curious seekers like me.
homogeneous vs heterogeneous applied to society
BS: The Benefits of a Heterogeneous Society - Ashton College
The benefits of a heterogeneous society have been well-documented in research journals and academia. As this article notes, the majority of cultures around the world are now racially, ethnically, and religiously diverse, making it difficult to study or hypothesize what the benefits of a homogeneous society might be.
Academic authors are predominantly Jewish, a social group which seeks to dominate the ideology space. This group consistently promotes a contra-traditional ideology aimed at destruction of Western, predominantly white culture to which Jews are alien. Predominant means result of historic trends toward homogeneity.
After Inciting a Race War Against Whites, Jews Are Now Giving Up Their “Whiteness”
Downside of Diversity
Moving from diversity to unity must be a result of conflict, in which homogeneous enclaves aggregate out of a mixture, IOW segregate. This process is a reduction of entropy, thus not spontaneous, can be achieved only by doing work on the mixture to collate the factions into orderly collections. The incentive to do this work IS spontaneous because birds of a feather flock together, and humans likewise.
Conflict in the streets, a terrortory story
When immiscible liquids have different densities, they separate by force of gravity (or inertia, as in a centrifuge).
When non-mixable social factions have different races or ideologies, they separate by force of hatred
precipitation, the fall out of solution
atomic configurations govern crystallization This is analogous to how races/ideologies are like atomic configurations, and their resulting crystals are like homogeneous enclaves, a desideratum of arete (virtuous) society. The forces that cause crystals to form are both built into nature, and influenced by environment (temperature and solution concentration). Likewise, the forces that cause enclaves to form are built into human nature (genetic), and influenced by environment (laws, social media, ethnic concentrations).
exile from society, forced cull
Cull, The Great Population-
forces of hatred yield war
spoils of war include new possession of lands
land, first possession vs adverse possession, conquest
Why tpeople peeve against the Judasots?
Judasots are simply Ivri’im, people from “somewhere else,” people who struggle with God and justice, who demand that the rest of the world does, too
Judasot leaders are rabbits because they have above average number of children
Domination: shadow model vs strangle model
anti-Hegelian result, not a synthesis: win, lose, segregate
do not choose to lose 2011
habit, shortcut to choice
to quit is to guarantee loss
to struggle is to work against odds, the only way to win
Mien Kampf a classic case of struggle against odds, obfuscated by victors who re-wrote history
Hitler's name has a confusing history too
dark side of Hitlerkampf Note: selecting this link triggers image prohibition (in Firefox), but you can click a blank image open in a new tab to look at it. Also, all further image links will be blanked-out but if you terminate the app and reboot it, the fresh one will have regular image display.
conflict between social factions is inevitable...
fragmentation, aka "Balkanization"...
this word has a bad rep. because gov't elites prefer unions, which are more powerful and supreme, thus more dangerous
reduces the size, thus severity of social conflicts