Nesta Webster

submitted by useless_aether from self.fof

In 1920, Webster was one of the contributing authors who wrote The Jewish Peril, a series of articles in the London Morning Post centred on the document The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.[6][7] These articles were compiled and published in the same year in book form under the title of The Cause of World Unrest.[8] Webster claimed that the authenticity of the Protocols of the Elders of Zion was an "open question".[9]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nesta_Helen_Webster

Nesta Helen Webster (1876-1960) was a British author, conspiracy theorist, and Nazi sympathiser. She was a member of the British Fascisti and the British Union of Fascists, and wrote extensively on the Illuminati and international Jewish conspiracies, including publicising the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in 1920 and popularising ideas about Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati. She also had a strong interest in Freemasonry, Kabbalah, and other mystical or esoteric topics. Although she has never been respected by historians, she was praised by right-wingers from Winston Churchill to Pat Robertson and Gary North.

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Nesta_Webster

all 14 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

And yet, her secret society work is backed by sources. Stop attacking the messenger. Read her work. She's wrong about the ZoG and The Elders of Zion but right about a lot of other things including her interesting book on the French Revolution.

Useless, you're a Zionist stop trying to hide it. Using the canary mission as a source which is owned by two Zionists, one of which has family members in thr IDF is all I need to know. At least admit it and say the Palestinians are not a legitimate people as some of the sources you link say this.

Zionism is thr antithesis of Yeshua's teachings, same with reactionary beliefs. The Palestinians are being ethnically cleansed by the Jewish Likud.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

i think i made it clear i am not interested in your opinons.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

I don't care you are posting Zionist disinformation.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

then prepare to get busy, shill

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So, you just admitted that you are a Zionist and you are posting Zionist disinformation. Gotcha. At least you now admit it. What is your take on the chabad-Lubavitch movement?

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

note, if you keep pulling crap out of your ass, you will be banned.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

You admitted it. I said you posted Zionist disinfo, you said prepare to get busy. As if now I must debunk more of your disinfo.

Peace.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (1 child)

no peace with the jesuit, new ager, rotschild wine drinking shills.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Jesuits are all corrupt. I admit that. But I also understand that it is more than just the Jesuits. Also, why are you calling me a new ager? Is it because someone else posted a link to you and then you lied and said I did about the shill James Perloff who had occult crap on his site? If that is the case, that only proves you are so closeminded you won't even admit you were wrong.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Lol, wikipedia. How about read her book shill.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

keep drinking your rotschild wine, new ager.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I go to church, occasionally, but church is filled with New age crap now. And Nesta Webster exposes the new age, occult and Kabbalah. Wikipedia was trying to trick people into thinkig she practices occultism. Thy are liars, just like how they lie about 9/11. Keep using wikipedia owned by a porn peddling Zionist to discredit yourself. I think using thr cannarymission was enougj for me to know that you aide with the Likud and Zionists. Which is fine as thousands do. But I'll co tinue to expose the unbiblical modern Israel.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

LMFAO, Nesta Webster detested the Nazis and Germany; she only supported Germany because she thought they would win against Sovietism. She was english and her book clearly lays out Pan-Germanism which she loathed.

[–]Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Fascist does not = Nazi

Fascist does not = Member of National soclialist German Workers Party

Fascist def. has been hijacked by academia and now can mean all kinds of things.

Webster detested Germany and Germany's secret socieites that pushed pan-Germanism which Hitler promotes.

Webster was NOT a member of the National Socialist German Workers Party. So dumb.

How can you freaking use wikipedia when they openly lie about 9/11 as a source to denounce anyone who talks about Zionists and Jews and Talmudism with sources that are from Jews!

In fact, she doesn't hate Jews at all and has relatives and friends who were Jews. How then could someone who detests Germany and Pan-Germanism be a Nazi, only Ziocon owned wikipedia would push this idiocy to discredit her well researched work. Maybe you should take the time to read it and aee that ahe also makes clear that COMMON JEW is being day in and day out propagandized by right-wing Likud Jews like Begin.

She wrote extensively on the Illuminati and international Jewish conspiracies, including publicising the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in 1920 and popularizing ideas about Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati.

No, she wrote about the Bavarian Illuminati with public archives and not lies peddled by disinfo agents. She even proved that Weishaupt was NOT A JEW nor a Jesuit. Someone I think all people, except zionists understand.

She also had a strong interest in Freemasonry, Kabbalah, and other mystical or esoteric topics.

She didn't have an interest in practicing these rites but in exposing them and using NOT HER OPINIONS but actual primary source material, like Eustace Mullins. Something Ellen Brown and Bill the shill Still Libartarian never, ever do.

Although she has never been respected by historians...

That's not true AT ALL; many historians respect her work on the French Revolution. And again, wikipedia doesn't source this statement, lmfao, hence they are using a fallacy to try to discredit her work. That would be if you wrote a book and were trying to sell it and then a bunch of people state:

His work isn't respected by us.

That doesn't mean anything. If anything it discredits those that are criticizing her work without even reading it.

...was praised by right-wingers from Winston Churchill to Pat Robertson and Gary North.

So? Just because someone praises someone, like how right wingers priase the Jew Gilad Atzmon for speaking out against Zionist and Bolshevik Jews doesn't mean anything. That is another fallacy called discredit by association.

...international Jewish conspiracies...

Nope but certain Jews in high places that have co apired hust as she has written about Weishaupt, and the Jesuits conspiracies as well as the Templars.

...publicizing the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in 1920 and popularising ideas about Adam Weishaupt and the Illuminati.

She said it couod be a forgery but is still open to debate concerning its authenticity. This was in 1920 mind you.

She disn't popularize any idea. She literally used Weishaupt's own writings and those in the Bavarian Illuminati as well as their opposition and historians on secret societies to create a narrative.

She also had a strong interest in Freemasonry, Kabbalah, and other mystical or esoteric topics.

Wrong, not an interest but in writing and exposing them.

How come you attack me with Fallacies and anyone who disagrees with you? You use reductio ad absurdums and discredit by association fallacies.

Here is her work ; read it if you want and arop wasting your time believing fallacies on wikipedia:

http://www.yamaguchy.com/library/webster/webster_index.html