The Annenbergs

submitted by useless_aether from self.fof

the rabbit hole starts with noam chomsky being a controlled opposition and a gatekeeper (as shown by james corbett) and his book 'manufacturing consent' https://ia902700.us.archive.org/31/items/pdfy-NekqfnoWIEuYgdZl/Manufacturing%20Consent%20%5BThe%20Political%20Economy%20Of%20The%20Mass%20Media%5D.pdf.

there is its far less famous co-author https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edward_S._Herman

he is dead, but he worked for the annenbergs at wharton https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wharton_School_of_the_University_of_Pennsylvania

their coat of arms: the upside down V is a templar chevron, the three dots represent isis, osiris and horus

also, note the use of 'alchemy'. they just love that sort of crap: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Annenberg_Foundation#Annenberg_Alchemy

here is one of their media fronts normalizing paedophilia:

http://www.neontommy.com/news/2013/10/pedophilia-sexual-orientation.html

https://archive.is/K0TAd

the impressum at the bottom of that page says:

Neon Tommy is the online publication of the Annenberg School for Communication & Journalism

more proof:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2013/oct/31/apa-correct-manual-clarification-pedophilia-not-se/

https://archive.is/Qlg0y

http://www.neontommy.com/annenberg-digital-news.html

https://archive.is/6aQSr

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/apa-classifying-pedophilia-as-a-sexual-orientation-was-an-error

https://archive.is/ZB9JV

for keeping eyes on the annenbergs in the future, they moved on to a new site:

http://www.uscannenbergmedia.com/

the annenbergs are also behind this site: https://www.factcheck.org/our-funding/

it's a disinfo site providing 'ammo' for the leftists.

https://www.factcheck.org/2009/12/climategate/

pushing global carbon tax agendas for the united nations and the elites/vatican behind it.

we know the catholic, or should i say jesuit/templar infiltrated church is run by pedophiles and the annenbergs are doing their part.

i think they are illuminati.

all 11 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

I respect the research, pretty solid. Nice read. Thanks, definitely food for thought.

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

phew, thanks! i was a bit worried about chomsky and you :-)

[–]magnora7 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

I still think Chomsky says a lot of intelligent things, but I am coming around to the idea that these books are perhaps as much user manuals for the elite as much as they they are for exposing the problems to the public with the intent of helping improve the problems.

And I totally agree with you that he's a gatekeeper about basically anything past 1985 or so.

But I still think sometimes he says smart things that are very true, that no one else is saying. So I'm like 60/40 on Chomsky, and I care more for select quotations of his, than for him as a person, or for his basket of ideologies. If that makes sense

[–]useless_aether[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

i understand. it was the same with me. it's always a gradual process as we piece together our bigger picture of the world. we can't just jump around with our worldview - then we wouldn't be able to trace our steps back when we get lost.

and he MUST say some good stuff otherwise nobody would listen to him. raising eyebrows is the secret to all these 'opinion formers'.

[–]Jesus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

/u/magnora7

Read Petras's 15 point thesis on Chomsky as a limited hangout and gatekeeper. I believe it is written in one of his books and published freely online. It proves that he's, if anything else, controlled. His attack on the JFK conspiracy narrative and Mossads involvement in both this event and 9/11 is enough for me to warrant suspicion.

[–]magnora7 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

we can't just jump around with our worldview - then we wouldn't be able to trace our steps back when we get lost.

That's very well said, I'd not thought of it quite that way before but you're definitely right.

and he MUST say some good stuff otherwise nobody would listen to him. raising eyebrows is the secret to all these 'opinion formers'.

Of course. All good propaganda is 9 truths for ever 1 lie. But still, it doesn't mean I can't learn from the 9 truths. No one knows the complete truth anyway, so we can't ever hang our hat on one person or ideology and just walk away and call it a day. Lots of people try to do this in general, and it doesn't really seem to work very well. All the most-respected people in human history formed their own ideologies, they didn't just use a cookie-cutter ideology that was handed to them, as so many people try to do.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yes, it isn't that you cannot learn from controlled oppositions and gatekeepers, you can, but one must be diligent in their awareness in that a gatekeepers goal is either to dissuade, surveil a community, discredit, gatekeep, lead astray, or ignore the more potent truths.

I always come back to people like Adam Green -- not a linguist in any stretch or form of the imagination -- but who, nevertheless, exposes truths concerning Zionism and Jewish supremeacy. Something Chomsky has gatekeeped.

But even Adam, who is cousins with the Manning brothers; who at one time worked for Viacom, which headquarters is in Tel Aviv, and who has 100,000 YouTube followers despite his obvious breaking of YouTube's terms of services is able to speak out against Zionism whilst people like I and anonymous users who have less than 1000 subs are deleted almost immediately, sometimes their videos banned during the upload process, as mine were concerning an expose on Neoconservatives and 9/11. This illustrates that most of the truth community is inauthentic and likely controlled. And I've noticed a deliberate disregard for noble lies and PSYOPS when it comes to these alleged controlled oppositions.

I only mention Adam, because he uses the train of multi-channel support to garner profits. And when he invites on shills like Christopher Jon Bjerknes to agree with him that Hitler was a Bolshevik and ban anyone who debunks this nonsense, it becomes even more clear that he has an agenda, albeit a subtle one.

It isn't just Chomsky, but they are gatekeeping the lower levels as well. Those who do it, do it merely for the spinach. Those who create disorder and attack other controlled oppositions to further divide.

I've come to realize that it's best to research on your own time and to take no mans statements as truth because those statements might match your biases. The elites know that so they gaive you what you want in a controlled manner which works to their benefit.

I always say, read censored and old historical books to get a better understanding of the world. Also, get out there and meet new people, see for yourself that is isn't as crazy as the mockingbird media would have you think it is.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Good research useless_aether.

[–]hennaojisan 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Not many scholars can make career changes like Chomsky. He started out in linguistics, inventing something called Transformational Grammar. Then, later on, he switched to whatever he likes to be called now.

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

austere scholar? :-)

[–]useless_aether[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/RomeRules/comments/3g7zgf/donald_trump_secret_jesuit_agent_for/