use the following search parameters to narrow your results:
e.g. subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
subreddit:pics site:imgur.com dog
advanced search: by author, sub...
~1 user here now
finance
the stock market is a scam.
submitted 3 years ago * by SubliminalCriminal from self.finance
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (3 children)
People just want honest leaders.
lol
I think somewhere around sixty percent want to go third party, but they can't because the way the system is designed.
If they abandon the 40% to create a new party, they will never win again. They would have to suffer under the ever growing totalitarianism forever, voiceless. With 3 parties, what prevents two of them from forging an alliance to permanently destroy the least likable party? It's either two-party or uniparty.
just be another branch of government
Your current branches have to work together for every decision, can't do anything separately. In a system with two independent leaders, they would be able to fully control their own sphere. This would allow for more specialization, thus more professionalism. It will make their domains smaller, thus easier to understand. Such system has both upsides and downsides.
an examination branch
The supreme court. But they don't control the army. Don't control the intelligence agencies. Сan't afford true impartiality.
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (2 children)
If they abandon the 40% to create a new party, they will never win again.
Until sixty percent of Democrats leave. It's possibly for them to do well, though, if we use a different system; the current system is rigged against third parties.
With 3 parties, what prevents two of them from forging an alliance to permanently destroy the least likable party? It's either two-party or uniparty.
That's literally what the Democrats and Republicans do. We have to change the system to prevent that from happening.
The supreme court.
That's a judicial branch, not an examination branch.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - 3 years ago (1 child)
the current system is rigged against third parties
Always has been. Everywhere. Why not rig it when you can?
It's possibly for them to do well, though, if we use a different system;
What system?
Show me the difference.
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - 3 years ago (0 children)
Wow, TAM is really clueless about all this stuff, isn't he?
view the rest of the comments →
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (3 children)
[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun - (2 children)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun - (1 child)
[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun - (0 children)