you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Sounds like a pretty good plan although

Investors would be liable for corporate activity, and would necessarily have greater influence in the activity of the corporation

this is like jamming a stick in the spokes of Wall St. It's probably too radical to ever pass but it sounds interesting. It would require some kind of radical transparency.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It would require some kind of radical transparency.

This wouldn't be a problem. Eliminating corporate personhood also eliminates the fraudulent individual rights that are granted to corporations.

No more 4th amendment protections. Search them, and seize them.

[–]Jesus 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It might be jamming a stick in the spokes of wallstreet, but having the legal representitives and shareholders be liable for malicious corporate activities would effectively curtail corporate shortcuts and bolster appropriate shareholder pursuits. If they could be sued directly this would give power back to the common person and provide them with a clean playing field. It would also hold corporations accountable for their misdeeds and these reprocussions would effectively increase shareholders pursuits into investing in good corporate practice.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Yeah it would be great for a lot of reasons, but the second shareholders are help personally liable, there are no more shareholders because they are risk averse colleges, cities, retirement funds, etc. They would all bail and it would just break the whole thing. Maybe that's for the best, heck if I know.