all 11 comments

[–]wendolynne 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

here's an interesting web site. click on "earth" in the lower left to get to the menu, to see the different types of data.

https://earth.nullschool.net/#current/wind/surface/level/orthographic=-34.03,51.42,445

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Another Agenda 21 milestone.

[–]Zizzle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Why should anyone believe in satellites when there are absolutely 0 photos of them in space? With the amount in low and high orbit we should be seeing them constantly in any "picture" of earth.

[–]magnora7[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

That's like saying we should see mosquitos in every picture of a forest. Satellites are tiny

[–]Zizzle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

However unlike satellites, there are photos of mosquitoes

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are plenty of photos of satellites lol

[–]Zizzle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

CGI sure, photos no

[–]magnora7[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then what are all the rockets launching constantly sending up in to space?

[–]Tom_Bombadil 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The moon is a satellite.

[–]Zizzle 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The moon is a mystery. According to the data, it should not exist.

[–]Tom_Bombadil 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Then the theory that the data was applied to is meaningless.

Theories must confirm to reality.