Pakistan's Climate Change Minister Sherry Rehman on floods

submitted by [deleted] from dw.com

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

No. Looking at maps and satellite images of floods did.

I was talking about your mule riders.

Which never occurred this perpetually in this kind of short periods world-wide since weather is systematically monitored by mankind. The same goes for droughts, fyi.

Simply not true. I guess, at this time most climate "scientists" are occupied with manipulating data to support their religion. Making the past cooler too make the present look warmer, denying floods and droughts of the past while exaggerating those of the present etc. Tony Heller exposes their corruption and their bullshit on a daily basis which is of course why he's banned from twitter etc. BTW the censorship alone should be proof enough for anybody with more than one brain cell that the truth is not on the side of the government funded climate "science".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I've seen two floods in Germany with my own eyes. Century floods within a decade.

Also, soil is regionally dried out up to a depth of 3 meters here. In Germany and Poland, e.g. Which even a whole year of rainy days couldn't possibly "fix".

Concerning the region of Pakistan / India, there are a lot of satellite images aviable for all the floods they had to suffer in the last 20 years. E.g. this one.

Or maybe you remember Katrina.

Just believing into one guy and denying anything else doesn't prove anything else than you're living in a filter bubble or echo chamber of your choosing.

Pathetically searching for pseudo-reasons to keep on wasting resources, this planet can't deliver much longer without collapsing almost all of its ecosystems.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Just believing into one guy and denying anything else

Just these few words provide a telling view into your infantile and narrow mind. Youre the stereotypical religious type. You believe what the mob believes, the "mainstream", or what you perceive as majority. You will always follow the most noisy loudmouths, the most obnoxious busybodies, because to you they radiate power and importance. You never think for yourself and you lack the capacity for complex, differentiated, reflexive, and critical thinking anyway. Your pea brain is purely a slave of your cowardice and your urge to belong.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You cite one source. For the second time already.

But you can comb my whole post history in https://saidit.net/s/environment/ for example, if you need more sources from all around the globe, possibly widening your seemingly very narrow view on this topic.

If and only if you are actually able to digest written information instead of scrolling videos. Because I personally dislike most of them. So you maybe are able to better see, what actually is happening. Since posting information isn't your strong suit, as far as I can judge this account of yours after two minutes.

I believe you're hallucinating a delusional view on the kind of whack-a-mole, we are playing here. You're the mole (also ...) . And I certainly got a lot of hammers.

Pathetic tries of character assassination like this I knew already firsthand before you even got your first "smart" device. I took them and I executed them, fyi.

And I'm not even mad at neither your offenses nor pathetic tries of "winning" this little dialogue here. It is a curse your whole generation has to bear.

Which makes me sad. And feel a little bit miserable for you.

But it also is definitely amusing. Again and again. Otherwise, why should I give a shit ?

Because I read above 50000 lines of text and write above 3000 lines on a mean day of mine while you are "watching" videos.

Living only a very shallow taste of my life in super-slow-motion possibly even refurbished in a plastic version for teens, so to say.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yet, after all this "effort" you arent even able to make a logically meaningful point, let alone make the whole string of compelling points that would be required to justify the climate change agenda that the actual destroyers of mankind are now putting in effect.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Define your kind of logic. I suppose, it is composed of exactly one state: How to inflate your non-existent pseudo-ego to some state "any"one relevant actually is able to "see" you without angstrom-grade magnification.

You're a walking self-reference, and as such a total paradox. Pointless, so to say.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Logic: "we have more floods today than in the past, this is caused by atmospheric CO2 increase, here's the data and the science to back it up, and here are compelling arguments why more power and more money for politicians will make things better"

You: "see all these floods recently OMG and also you suck"

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Nobody can make it better for the foreseeable future, no matter what some asshat bobbleheads heat the room with.

But: We can slow it down by using natural resources more reasonably.

Take a bike or a train, if you can. You know ? Instead of driving your tank to the next liquor store to buy a six-pack for example.

Especially US citizens can.

To give all those people in the regions mostly affected at least a fair chance to adapt. Instead of ignoring the facts and forcing people in poorer regions to migrate elsewhere because their home regions simply have become uninhabitable before they even had a chance to act.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Humans, like every other species, will thrive and multiply until environmental conditions and scarcity wont allow any more growth. This is the natural way of things and of all life. In fact, therein lies the divine power of life. We always push from below against some natural ceiling. If you decide for yourself (or for others in case youre a tyrant) to reduce your consumption of resources, others will gladly consume what you leave be.

The idea of throttling human growth today to avoid reaching this natural ceiling is just as nonsensical as committing suicide because one fears death.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Throttling overpopulation is completely different from throttling the overproduction of waste. Destroying our own natural habitat in the process.

The divinity of nature is that it doesn't know waste.

Which we actually could adapt. If our "elite" wasn't this fucking stupid from centuries of incest.