Pakistan's Climate Change Minister Sherry Rehman on floods

submitted by [deleted] from dw.com

all 17 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

  • That is one ugly broad
  • I'm not watching videos
  • Pakistan is a flood plain for the northern/western mountains around it and has always/will always flood due to geography when monsoons come, not climate change
  • but Im guessing that's not her take seeing she's a climate change minister
  • which I won't know because I'm not watching videos LOL

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

And Imagine that country has nuclear weapons.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Pakistani citizen's possible bigger problem is that their politicians and especially ISI have a tradition of notoriously trying to play both sides when it comes to geopolitics.

Without their cooperation, the invasion of Afghanistan e.g. never could have been possible.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (13 children)

Pakistan of all places has a climate religion minister? I guess they get a couple billions from the world bank to have her and show the west how its done (while hopefully ignoring this nonsense in reality)?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

See: Even some people still "riding mules" have recognized that climate change actually is a problem.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (11 children)

How do you know? Did your TV tell you that?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

No. Looking at maps and satellite images of floods did.

And since these floods put many people in misery for over 20 years now all around the world, I feel inclined to believe into these consequences of climate change.

Which never occurred this perpetually in this kind of short periods world-wide since weather is systematically monitored by mankind. The same goes for droughts, fyi.

But since you rather believe in denying facts, why do I even spend time answering your obviously rather stupid questions ?

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

No. Looking at maps and satellite images of floods did.

I was talking about your mule riders.

Which never occurred this perpetually in this kind of short periods world-wide since weather is systematically monitored by mankind. The same goes for droughts, fyi.

Simply not true. I guess, at this time most climate "scientists" are occupied with manipulating data to support their religion. Making the past cooler too make the present look warmer, denying floods and droughts of the past while exaggerating those of the present etc. Tony Heller exposes their corruption and their bullshit on a daily basis which is of course why he's banned from twitter etc. BTW the censorship alone should be proof enough for anybody with more than one brain cell that the truth is not on the side of the government funded climate "science".

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

I've seen two floods in Germany with my own eyes. Century floods within a decade.

Also, soil is regionally dried out up to a depth of 3 meters here. In Germany and Poland, e.g. Which even a whole year of rainy days couldn't possibly "fix".

Concerning the region of Pakistan / India, there are a lot of satellite images aviable for all the floods they had to suffer in the last 20 years. E.g. this one.

Or maybe you remember Katrina.

Just believing into one guy and denying anything else doesn't prove anything else than you're living in a filter bubble or echo chamber of your choosing.

Pathetically searching for pseudo-reasons to keep on wasting resources, this planet can't deliver much longer without collapsing almost all of its ecosystems.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Just believing into one guy and denying anything else

Just these few words provide a telling view into your infantile and narrow mind. Youre the stereotypical religious type. You believe what the mob believes, the "mainstream", or what you perceive as majority. You will always follow the most noisy loudmouths, the most obnoxious busybodies, because to you they radiate power and importance. You never think for yourself and you lack the capacity for complex, differentiated, reflexive, and critical thinking anyway. Your pea brain is purely a slave of your cowardice and your urge to belong.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

You cite one source. For the second time already.

But you can comb my whole post history in https://saidit.net/s/environment/ for example, if you need more sources from all around the globe, possibly widening your seemingly very narrow view on this topic.

If and only if you are actually able to digest written information instead of scrolling videos. Because I personally dislike most of them. So you maybe are able to better see, what actually is happening. Since posting information isn't your strong suit, as far as I can judge this account of yours after two minutes.

I believe you're hallucinating a delusional view on the kind of whack-a-mole, we are playing here. You're the mole (also ...) . And I certainly got a lot of hammers.

Pathetic tries of character assassination like this I knew already firsthand before you even got your first "smart" device. I took them and I executed them, fyi.

And I'm not even mad at neither your offenses nor pathetic tries of "winning" this little dialogue here. It is a curse your whole generation has to bear.

Which makes me sad. And feel a little bit miserable for you.

But it also is definitely amusing. Again and again. Otherwise, why should I give a shit ?

Because I read above 50000 lines of text and write above 3000 lines on a mean day of mine while you are "watching" videos.

Living only a very shallow taste of my life in super-slow-motion possibly even refurbished in a plastic version for teens, so to say.

[–]Feldheld 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Yet, after all this "effort" you arent even able to make a logically meaningful point, let alone make the whole string of compelling points that would be required to justify the climate change agenda that the actual destroyers of mankind are now putting in effect.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

Define your kind of logic. I suppose, it is composed of exactly one state: How to inflate your non-existent pseudo-ego to some state "any"one relevant actually is able to "see" you without angstrom-grade magnification.

You're a walking self-reference, and as such a total paradox. Pointless, so to say.