you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]iamonlyoneman 17 insightful - 3 fun17 insightful - 2 fun18 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Hm every time I look at the charts produced by people who cool the past data points, the line always trends consistently up

But when I look at the University of Alabama dataset that ignores urban heat islands and isn't fraudulently changed for political reasons, it shows three zero-trend periods separated by big El Nino years where there are step changes.

So obviously the people who aren't cooling the past for grant money purpose are the ones telling me the truth.

[–]weavilsatemyface[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

But when I look at the University of Alabama dataset

You got a link to that? Because the one I know of shows pretty obvious warming over 40+ years.

it shows three zero-trend periods separated by big El Nino years where there are step changes.

And the El Nino step changes reverse afterwards do they? There's a step down after each step up?

Proof that every staircase goes nowhere and does not rise above ground level: the stairs are flat, zero-trend, followed by a big step up. Therefore the steps aren't rising! Checkmate scientists!

[–]Davethe_blank_ 8 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 1 fun9 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

I'm sorry, but you're a fucking idiot. Anyone clamoring on the global warming hysteria nonsense train is a fucking idiot. You think you're so smart and care so much about the planet, but too fucking stupid to realize that water vapor is far more prevalent and is very close in wavelengths of light that are absorbed by CO2. CO2 that gas essential to life on this planet but is only .04% of the atmosphere and humans only contribute to 4% of that. But go ahead and talk about graphs from bought and sold "scientists" you fucking moron.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Dave is right.

[–]weavilsatemyface[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

too fucking stupid to realize that water vapor is far more prevalent.

I know that water vapour is the stronger greenhouse gas than CO2. But its not water vapour increasing in the earth's atmosphere at an unprecedented rate, its CO2. CO2 is the trigger that, if left unchecked, will start a disastrous feedback cycle that more CO2 leads to more warming that leads to

  • less ice to reflect sunlight back into space (more warming)
  • more evaporation and water vapour (more warming)
  • methane released from permafrost (more warming).

CO2 is not the only or even the strongest greenhouse gas, but it is the key to keeping it under control.

[–]iamonlyoneman 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

https://i.imgur.com/1WnfSJD.jpg

compare to CO2 (which, hint, is unrelated): https://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/CO2-model-vs-MLO-1950-2021.jpg

Did I say there's no warming trend, or did I say you were being lied to?