you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fonched 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

There seems to be more compounding factors; that conditions have worsened as a result of colonization and thus the colonized people have no place to choose but to head to a Western nation, or that strong connections (UK-India) make it inevitable that mingling happens. Thoughts on that? There are two flavors of the first argument, that being pre-WW2 imperialism and the other being any of the recent destabilization in the Middle East and Latin America. I don't know who's to blame for the latter, as the left may hint towards it being WS.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

There seems to be more compounding factors; that conditions have worsened as a result of colonization and thus the colonized people have no place to choose but to head to a Western nation,

Jared Taylor famously mentioned his parents took him to Africa as a kid and he had visited two countries. One that was colonized by Europeans and the other that wasn't.

In no scenario was the non-colonized country better off than the colonized ones. The idea that railroads, electricity, automobiles were going to show up in regions that were without a doubt, still stuck in the stone ages when Europeans first arrived is complete fiction.

The same is true if you look at the Americas. Before Europeans arrived, none of the Native Indians had even heard of firearms or constructed Two Story Buildings.

The harsh truth behind these differences can be traced to Evolution and Intelligence even though Western Academia will do everything to make this taboo. But the old saying "facts don't care about feelings" holds true no matter what. The IQ gaps will forever hold these other races back from being equal to the ones who colonized them.