A brief, and thought-provoking interpretation of Book 1 of Nietzsche's On The Genealogy of Morals. It's about Aryans and Jews, so it seemed like it belonged here. Remarks in parentheses are mine and not taken from Nietzsche's writing. Enjoy, become filled with rage, or maybe share your thoughts.

Once, long ago, the Aryan people had no conception of Good and Evil, they had Good and Bad (Nietzsche was a philologist and a historian, this is a plausible if unprovable claim). The Good was that which confirmed life and made one strong and well. The Bad was that which made one sick and suffer.

Things worked well for these people until the Jews came along. The Jews were ‘Bad’ as all priestly caste people are according to Nietzsche – they deny life and everything in it, and look to the ‘afterlife’, it is a philosophy of death, sickness and misery and denial. Bad wasn’t evil, Good was just ‘better’, the Good were ‘higher’ than the Bad. Nietzsche calls this the Master and Slave morality.

Now these Jews with their slave morality were resentful of their lot in life. They were so resentful, they were filled with hatred for everything ‘Good’ that was higher than them. They named the ‘Good’ the ‘Evil’, thereby creating a new opposite of Good (eating from the tree of knowledge of good and evil, its right there in the bible). The Aryans had many ‘Goods’ and therefore many Gods to embody them (notice the similarity of these words, good->god, evil->devil). The Jewish concept of duality only had room for one Good, the Slave morality, and one God to represent it. (The only other people to create this kind of Dualistic Good/Evil Deitic split is the Zoroastrians, an Iranian people they surely borrowed this concept from when refiguring the pantheist roots of semitic religions into Monotheism during their exile from Babylon)

This twisted ideology of sickness and despair gave root to Christianity which infected the Aryan people with their theological disease of naming all that is actually Good as 'Evil'