Strength through Oy-Veh!: How Jews Dementedly Pursue Power by Dishonestly Playing the Victim. The Occidental Observer.

submitted by Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist from theoccidentalobserver.net

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist[S] 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

SS: ... A minority can suffer “worse” even if it is much more likely to be the perpetrator of a hate-crime against the majority than the victim of a hate-crime by the majority. Suppose, for example, that there was a country with 1,000,000 White inhabitants and 1,000 Black inhabitants. If 1% of the Whites were non-violent hate-criminals and 100% of the Blacks were violent hate-criminals, there would be 10,000 Whites committing non-violent hate-crimes against Blacks and 1,000 Blacks committing violent hate-crimes against Whites. Suppose that each Black hate-criminal murdered one White every year, while each White hate-criminal sent a postcard to a random Black saying “BLACKS ARE MUCH MORE VIOLENT THAN WHITES” (by leftist standards, this factual statement would count as a “hate-crime” just as much as the murder of a White).

Now look at the statistics and the relative risk. In the vast majority of years, all 1,000 Blacks would receive one or more post-cards and suffer “hate-crime,” while 1,000 Whites would be murdered. Therefore 100% of Blacks would suffer hate-crime but only 0.1% of Whites would (1,000 / 1,000,000 = 0.001 = 0.1%). Blacks would be one thousand times more likely to suffer hate-crime than Whites. So an anti-racist organization in that hypothetical country would be perfectly accurate, but highly dishonest, if it put up billboards reading “Why am I a thousand times more likely to suffer hate-crime? #BecauseImBlack #StandWithBlacks.”

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Interesting thought experiment.

I've seen alt hype argue the exact opposite point in defense of whites against leftists who used the above logic (although I fail to remember the exact context, it was a few years back), but his counter-argument to the anti white leftists was that for every interracial encounter, you have 1 black and 1 white individual.

I'd have to play around with some numbers or try to find the article on his website, I believe it was an article and not one of his videos.

Let's say whites have a risk of 50% to do a hate crime during an encounter, and blacks have the same. Then the number of hate crimes would be the same for both blacks and whites, however much fewer whites would've committed hate crimes proportionately. In your example after 1000 interracial encounters, 500 blacks did a hate crime, 500 whites did. 50% of blacks did (500 / 1000) while only 0.01% of whites did.