you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]TheWorldToCome 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"undersexed" by what, your degen western standards where women should slut around?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh please, just stop with this Puritan garbage. No one here defends current Western degeneracy, but the answer is not Puritanism.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, his comment is retarded.

Contemporary 'undersexualization' is, prima facie paradoxically, the product of hypersexualization. Hypersexualization creates an 'undersexed' society; 'Puritans' are vastly more fertile than anyone in an 'undersexed' society and so cannot seriously be analogized to today's 'incels' or 'femcels' or whomever. Hell, 'Puritan' Whites were having more kids then than most blacks were then and are today. Of course that's the answer: that was a eugenic society, not a dysgenic one. Fertility negatively correlates with sexualization: high sexualization = low fertility.

With a high enough birth rate, non-white immigration would barely even matter to us today: the need for an ethnostate and remigration and whatever else only comes about because of low numbers that are easily swamped by racial outsiders. Liberal anti-'Puritanism' gave us most of these problems to begin with.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Liberalism came from Puritanism.