Japan’s ageing population poses urgent risk to society, says PM

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

They're the 3rd richest country in the world that is still 99.9% homogenous and very conservative to boot.

So "conservative" they have the biggest incel population on the planet. It's an extremely undersexed society. Their women are desperate for a decent looking white guy to bang their brains out. It's utterly pathetic. Wealth and homogeneity is of no value whatsoever if your society has reached that state of passivity. At that point you deserve to die out.

China (2nd richest, but ruled by a Communist government that will lock you in your house).

Typical cuckservative whining about muh big government.

Japan looks like paradise in every scenario.

No, it really doesn't.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

So "conservative" they have the biggest incel population on the planet. It's an extremely undersexed society. Their women are desperate for a decent looking white guy to bang their brains out.

And yet most Japanese still stay put on their own island.

Typical cuckservative whining about muh big government.

Except this is big government that wants to control your every body movement. The end result is always slavery or famine.

No, it really doesn't.

Any other country or example you could name has no influence on the global stage.

And yes it matters. Look at the Palestinians to see what having no wealth/power gets you.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

And yet most Japanese still stay put on their own island.

Sure, and how do they act when a white guy enters their island? That's obviously a rhetorical question.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Sure, and how do they act when a white guy enters their island? That's obviously a rhetorical question.

We have a real example right now with the current Ukraine War. Only 2,000 refugees from a White country have been accepted in Japan.

https://www.npr.org/2022/10/29/1127430620/japan-has-taken-in-hundreds-of-ukrainians-the-welcome-for-others-has-been-less-w

Either they're not thirsty, or Japan as a society still values making it difficult for foreigners to move to their country.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Are you really this dense?

Never mind. I forgot it was you, radicalfag.

[–]TheWorldToCome 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

"undersexed" by what, your degen western standards where women should slut around?

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Oh please, just stop with this Puritan garbage. No one here defends current Western degeneracy, but the answer is not Puritanism.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Yeah, his comment is retarded.

Contemporary 'undersexualization' is, prima facie paradoxically, the product of hypersexualization. Hypersexualization creates an 'undersexed' society; 'Puritans' are vastly more fertile than anyone in an 'undersexed' society and so cannot seriously be analogized to today's 'incels' or 'femcels' or whomever. Hell, 'Puritan' Whites were having more kids then than most blacks were then and are today. Of course that's the answer: that was a eugenic society, not a dysgenic one. Fertility negatively correlates with sexualization: high sexualization = low fertility.

With a high enough birth rate, non-white immigration would barely even matter to us today: the need for an ethnostate and remigration and whatever else only comes about because of low numbers that are easily swamped by racial outsiders. Liberal anti-'Puritanism' gave us most of these problems to begin with.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Liberalism came from Puritanism.

[–]ShekelPa 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Youre a dumbass.