Curtis Yarvin name-dops Lothrop Stoddard

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from self.debatealtright

In this debate Yarvin recommends reading The French Revolution in San Domingo by Stoddard around the 30 minute mark. I found that rather odd. Why would a Jew recommend a KKK member and racialist/eugenicist intellectual?

Video:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xF_iyGUmV4U&t=4882s

all 6 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Curtis Yarvin must find if frustrating when he's read more than almost any leftists he debates. I don't think he's really promoting white nationalism by recommending Stoddard. More like humble bragging to the fat guy that he know more about liberalisms and the left than he does.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

By the way, Stoddard was actually highly critical of Nazi Germany because he was a staunch pacifist. He thought war was extremely dysgenic, which is true. Not to mention the fact that WWII was basically a bunch of amazing whites killing each other en masse. He also wrote about his worries concerning Jews in Germany at the time. Maybe that's why Yarvin likes him.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Why would a Jew recommend a KKK member and racialist/eugenicist intellectual?

Because he agrees with such views.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Is he really that based?

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

He posted race realist views on his old blog.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Never read them.