all 6 comments

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 4 insightful - 2 fun4 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

So this thread attracts nothing but six comments from three of the biggest subhuman tards on this site, the biggest of whom (the mentally ill moron 'socks' who continues to imperialistically spread hegemonic, pro-System narratives into this site instead of fucking off back to Reddit) turns this thread into little more than absurd paranoiac waffling about a practically non-existent group like the KKK with a doused in drivel about how intelligent he supposedly is.

Imagine waffling about the KKK... in 2022. Last I heard, they had black members and were merely building literal roads: well, that's more than the worthless subhuman perpetually online 'socks' will ever do.

Likewise, imagine being a philosemite in 2022. Unable to see patterns to the point of being utterly braindead?

Likewise, imagine thinking that the 'Far-Right' was bad in 2022. Do these people just have a sick urge to castrate little boys or something?

Now, look at this low-IQ drivel:

then a day to respond to DAR arguments

Does anyone seriously think that socks is anything more than a vile failed subhuman who doesn't even remotely deserve a response to anything that he ever writes? Notice that the number of DAR arguments are precisely zero, because nobody of sane mind actually takes socks' worldview seriously? Notice that this asshole inflates his own worth wherever he goes, acting like some bigshot when he's a terminally online nobody in reality?

This appears to be his main concern and deserves attention, but ALL of the owners and managers are not Jewish. It's a strawman argument.

So if 99.9% are Jewish and 0.01% are goy-ish... no problem according to 'socks'? We need to increase it by 0.01% at which point it arbitrarily becomes a problem?

Do 100% of blacks need to commit crimes to warrant declaring them subhuman? Evidently not. 13-56 is enough of an argument. Likewise, we do not need 100% of something to be zhiddish for it to be a problem.

More of the same stupid victimhood BS.

The same victimhood 'BS' that pervades Jewish thought even more than black thought? Victimhood: wrong when blacks express it towards Jews; correct when everyone expresses it towards Whites? Ah... the usual nonsensical Left-wing double standards at play. There is no strawman involved here.

Jews are clearly above blacks in America—as evidenced in the cases of Oprah, Nick Cannon and most recently, Kanye and Kyrie, except in the deranged mind of 'socks' in which the KKK lives rent free. Note: Jews are the only group that are 'lower' (from a Leftist perspective, i.e. actually at the top in practice) than blacks in the American social structure. Zhids can criticize blacks all they like; blacks cannot criticize zhids. Both can say whatever they like about Whites, who are at the 'highest' (i.e. at the bottom in practice) point of the American social structure, as evidenced by nobody caring one iota about the numerous anti-White statements made by the likes of Oprah, Nick Cannon and Dave Chappelle, all three of whom would have long been deported or killed for their bullshit in any White supremacist society.

Ban these three low-IQ subhuman fuckers, none of whom contribute anything to do this site. If someone walks into your home and takes a massive shit on the floor like they do, you'd want them gone. Online, things should be no different.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

Well written piece, didn't know that stuff about Public Enemy, thanks for sharing

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

    You need to read that article more carefully, some of those things were just explaining what Kanye said (which the author says are stupid), as the author says "It’s probably best recounting them, more or less in the order of utterance:" before listing them

    Blacks are the 12 lost tribes of Israel, and therefore the real Jews.

    Thats what Kanye said, the author said he thought this was stupid

    Ye wished his children had learned about Hannukah instead of “a complicated Kwanzaa,” because Hannukah would at least “come with some financial engineering.”

    ditto

    I see two claims here that the author of that article defended

    Jared Kushner only worked on a peace deal between Israel and Arab nations in order to make money.

    At least partially true as you acknowledge

    “Jewish people have owned the Black voice. Either it’s through us wearing the Ralph Lauren shirt, or it’s all of us being signed to a record label, or having a Jewish manager, or being signed to a Jewish basketball team, or doing a movie on a Jewish platform like Disney.”

    No, obviously not all the owners and managers are Jewish. But i am not sure this a strawman argument, he isn't putting words in anyones mouth then attacking them over it

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The KKK love to see blacks who fuck up in the manner Kanye did, and that's exactly the motivation of the author: look at this dumbass black dude in context of Zionist control in the US. It's a weak word salad of KKK mentality.

      Do I think the author probably has an ideology that includes white supremacy? Yes, I do. But I don't think its fair to say the piece was written that way, and I don't see him making those arguments in this piece. I also think his analysis of the dyamics between blacks and jews in america is quite compelling.

      I think there is something to what he is saying here. Try to see this from the black perspective for a minute. From their perspective, Jews often look indistinguishable from white people, and are often in positions of wealth and influence. They look like the super-whites with extra privilege and rights from this perspective. Remember when Whoopie Goldberg was suspended for saying Jews were white? Even though she is a liberal media with an assumed Jewish name. This is not an uncommon or crazy perception to have as black person. Even the Rolling Stone magazine refers to Cohen, Levy, and Lubinsky as "white". And furthermore, they aren't allowed to speak against these people who have far more privelege than them.

      Furthermore, the industries the Jews tend to have a staggeringly disproportionate power and influence in sectors that are particularly exploitative of the Blacks. Music, Entertainment, Basketball, and Landlordism, Banking

      "In 2016, local news website Patch published a list of the 100 worst slumlords in Harlem, with the top ten including seven Jews (Mark Silber, Adam Stryker, Joel Goldstein, Marc Chemtob, Moshe Deutsch, Solomon Gottlieb, and Jason Green), a representation that has remained roughly constant every year, with Jews persistently claiming top ranking for building violations, rodent infestations, lack of maintenance, exploitative rent, mold, and other forms of building decay injurious to health."

      Furthermore, it DOES look like the Jewish community seems to feel particularly threatened by the idea of Blacks "punching up" at them, and he has provided plenty of evidence of this. I could point to Mel Gibson and others that are white and have made similar statements against the Jews, but have not received anywhere near the backlash of Professor Griff, Ice Cube, Kanye, Kyrie Irving or Dave Chappelle

      https://forward.com/culture/479251/mel-gibson-robert-downey-jr-josh-malina-lethal-weapon-antisemitism-cancel/

      Per my first sentences, I am obviously discussing the problems of the entire article, and Kanye's claims are generally favored in the article

      I don't think thats fair, he disagrees with most of Kanye's comments but agrees about the sentiment, says it is widespread in the Black Community, and that the blacks in general are not unjustified in feeling this way. It feels like you are not objectively considering the contents of this article, and are letting your distaste for his underlying ideology skew your perception of what he is trying to say here. I thought he made a reasonable and objective argument

      [–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      Public Enemy later quietly attempted to reintroduce him into some form of participation in band activities, but were condemned by then ADL chief Abe Foxman who accused Public Enemy of a “repugnant charade characterized by cynicism and disdain for the public.”

      So it wasn't just a clever name...

      [–]BISH 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      The first paragraph is intentionally distracting, but the rest is well written.