BTIR: Saidit users who aren't "alt-right," why aren't you?

submitted by cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JasonCarswellVoluntaryist 11 insightful - 6 fun11 insightful - 5 fun12 insightful - 6 fun -  (5 children)

Fuck authority.
Absolute power corrupts absolutely.
Always.

Left / Right are horizontal distractions from vertical Tyranny / Freedom.

Why haven't the Alt-Right discovered Voluntaryism?
(/s/Voluntaryism, /s/Voluntarism is a bastardisation, /s/Anarcho_Capitalism, /s/AnarchoCapitalism, /s/Anarchocommunism, /s/Anarkikomunismolando, and I just discovered there is not yet an /s/Anarchism sub. Voluntary interactions between consenting people should not to be confused with managing volunteers. I used to post in the latter until someone finally created the former sub.)

Also, why does /u/magnora7 insist on keeping /s/DebateAltRight soft-censored yet /s/TumblrInAction, /s/RealIncels, and /u/HongKongPhooey are free to pollute the front page?

I am pro-whatever you want. I am white. I am deaf in one ear. Neither are accomplishments so I'm proud of neither. I'm also not against either, nor alternatives or variants. I'm not supreme over anyone else, though feel free to complement me all you like.

"Political correctness" is artificial controlled manipulation - thus I'm against political correctness in favour of freedom of expression. I'm also against ALL mafias/governments, globalists/Zionists, and groups based on/in secrecy for more power.

Racism is ignorance and fear, visualised. Half of everyone is stupider than average, and most of the rest are really fucking close to being average. Thus most people are average and that's not-great, so it's easy to look at most people of any group and blame them for being not-great, especially if you can focus on one or few aspects that are different or foreign to who you identify with.

[–][deleted] 5 insightful - 3 fun5 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 3 fun -  (4 children)

and I just discovered there is not yet an /s/Anarchism sub

There is, it's just private, I tried to create one with that exact name, but it already exists. You have to apply, and I have no idea if it's even active to accept requests. Needing to be accepted by an authority is so against the tenets of anarchism that I refused to apply to their fake bullshit

Also, why does /u/magnora7 insist on keeping /s/DebateAltRight soft-censored yet /s/TumblrInAction, /s/RealIncels, and /u/HongKongPhooey are free to pollute the front page?

He's banned me repeatedly, and what rules are those subs or I breaking?

(see u/Antarchomachus, u/Jackalope, u/yoghurt, u/brogurt, etc etc, id say hes banned 30 of my accounts)

He has cited 'dragging down the discussion' in banning me but that is bad faith bullshit, as that refers to the debate pyramid, i.e. moving from debate to ad-hominems and name calling, none of which are violated by posting news stories about insane retards shoving things up their butts or thinking they are possessed by demons, or any of the other mental retardation I regularly post about to laugh at

"Political correctness" is artificial controlled manipulation - thus I'm against political correctness in favour of freedom of expression.

But not when it comes to the incels, people who dislike the trans agenda, or my retarded news stories? Those should not be expressed on the front page? You are directly contradicting what you said in the last paragraph. You are literally objecting to said material on the grounds that it is politically incorrect

Anything you don't like is 'pollution', and you are literally calling for M7 to censor it, while saying you are in favor of free expression. Seriously wtf Jason, I don't understand you sometimes, or how you could possibly hold these two contradictory ideas in your brain in such close proximity

[–]Bigs 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

If you've been banned 30 times, why not just get the hint and go elsewhere?

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Most of those were parody accounts, only 2 were main accounts, I've had this one for 9 months. Also I don't much care if a single admin doesn't like my posts, especially when they are clearly not in violation of the rules, and there is no way to really enforce banning me from this site that I can't easily get around. There are plenty of users I am friendly with who appreciate my interactions, I mean look at my post Karma ffs, and then look at yours, and tell me who should be the one to take a hike

Only a bootlicker would take an unjust banning lying down like a little bitch if they had the means to be not banned

[–]Bigs 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You're proud of your karma eh? lol

[–]Airbus320 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

Mm