BTIR: Saidit users who aren't "alt-right," why aren't you?

submitted by cisheteroscumWhite Nationalist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (12 children)

Wasn't alt-right pretty much just usurped by Trump? Wouldn't it be kinda silly to support a group of people whose campaign is pretty much just based on denying the legitimacy of their own government?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 10 insightful - 3 fun10 insightful - 2 fun11 insightful - 3 fun -  (11 children)

No. Alt right means pro-white, against organised jewry. Trump is neither of those things.

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (10 children)

Aren't you really just personally and directly denying the legitimacy of the current U.S. government?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (9 children)

And all past ones

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Isn't this pretty much just a non-starter in a two-party system? Shouldn't we probably want both parties to uphold free and fair elections if our goal is national stability?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 11 insightful - 3 fun11 insightful - 2 fun12 insightful - 3 fun -  (7 children)

What interest do white people have in the state that is subjugating them, and genociding them, in being stable?

[–][deleted] 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Aren't I just saying that my political priority is always national stability?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 9 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 2 fun10 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

Right, so how do you hope to achieve national stability in a country ruled by jews that control both parties and their will is that the country be crime ridden, have terrible infrastructure and social services, a FUBAR economy etc?

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

the country be crime ridden

Won't this just make social skills an adaptive trait and encourage the right to be armed in public?

have terrible infrastructure

Can't we just mine lithium from the piedmont and push forward in our car-centric world?

and social services

Shouldn't social services always be secondary to the stability of the core government? Wouldn't a universal healthcare system, for example, be tying the stability of the government to some arbitrary social service?

a FUBAR economy

Can't we just fix labor prices by importing 300 million refugees by 2050? Wouldn't that be just a two-birds-with-one-stone solution (in addition to showing global empathy for those less fortunate)?

how do you hope to achieve

Isn't the best path toward anything really just improving the existing system instead of collapsing into anarchy and starting anew?

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 8 insightful - 4 fun8 insightful - 3 fun9 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

Oh I see you're a troll doing a 'most retarded version of a libtard' you can think of bit. Have fun with that squirt.

[–][deleted]  (2 children)

[deleted]