Kamala Harris has the logical, moral high ground suggesting that “people of color” should be given hurricane help first.

submitted by curious2 from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (17 children)

Imagine you were arguing with a white liberal repeating Kamala’s position

They are being anti white

[–][deleted]  (16 children)

[deleted]

    [–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

    Yes, it does. It is a very simple response and it highlights exactly the issue instantly.

    Will you convince leftists? No. But white normies? Yes certainly. The follow up question would be why would whites support someone who is anti white? And from this you frame the entire discussion and they will have to:
    1) agree that they are anti white
    or 2) be in a defensive position arguing why they are not actually anti white

    2 is best, because it puts them on the defensive and everyone watching can see that they're just making excuses. 1 is also fine, because now everyone knows that they don't represent them, if they're white.

    It also reinforces a white group identity which is good.

    [–][deleted]  (5 children)

    [deleted]

      [–]DragonerneJesus is white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

      Yes, but I would never try to convince a white liberal. I would try to convince the audience.

      It is pointless to argue with liberals. They are anti white.

      [–][deleted]  (3 children)

      [deleted]

        [–]DragonerneJesus is white 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

        Are you seriously talking about "the less fortunate" during a fucking hurricane? Sorry, lady, I can see that your entire house and neighborhood has been completely obliterated by the hurricane, but your skin is white, so we have to help Shaniqua first even though her house barely has any damage.

        To be honest, it is easy to argue against "the less fortunate" argument, especially where I am from in Denmark, because we've spent the past 40 years arguing for NOT seeing race and not generalising on the basis of race. Woke arguments only really work for those who are anti white, not normies.

        [–][deleted]  (1 child)

        [deleted]

          [–]DragonerneJesus is white 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

          You wanted the moral highground? They're being a racist antiwhite person advocating for racediscrimination against white people? How many normies do you think will see THEM as having the moral highground?

          Only those who also hate white people will come to their defence and they are not our allies or friends.

          [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

          ^ This jew is right, nobody cares about their evil genocidal intentions against white people being pointed out. The reason being this is official policy and they're just going along with jewish power, there's no repercussions for hating white people. In fact there's somewhat of an incentive system in place whereby declaring your loyalty you can avoid punishment: an 'Emperor Has No Clothes' or 'Point Deer; Make Horse', situation. There's of course no reward for publically declaring your loyalty to jews, but at least you can temporarily avoid their cruel and unusual punishments.

          [–][deleted]  (7 children)

          [deleted]

            [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

            The argument is inconsequential, you can post facto conjure up any justification for why going along with power is supposedly correct based on any chosen classification.

            [–][deleted]  (5 children)

            [deleted]

              [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

              This isn't a club that worships debate, the debate is about discussing our ideas. Not just a universal debate club that wants to 'deboonk' any random nonsense.

              [–][deleted]  (3 children)

              [deleted]

                [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

                Nobody was convinced by ideas, they just go along with power. You are the only one with a non-understanding of the situation, or at least feigning so.

                [–]Nasser 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

                How would logic apply to historical revolutionary movements like the Nazi's,Bolsheviks, Maoists etc? They didn't hold the/many levers of power and took powers in a large part due to people buying into their ideas?