you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

IQ worship is for fags

https://saidit.net/s/debatealtright/comments/95uh/what_do_you_consider_the_most_influential/

Which is why I don't worship it, I actually mostly agree with the statement, but I wanted to hear his objective reasons and argument.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

My answer to the same question:

Look at military/political history (empires, great men etc), mythology, architecture, painting, music, literature, sculpture, poems, the greatest explorers, inventors etc. Almost every single person who has participated in history in any meaningful way has been an Aryan, and almost all high culture and civilisational history has been white. Even outside of that there's a lot of evidence, up to literal descriptions of 'bearded white men with blue eyes', that most of the non-white high cultures and civilisations were actually founded by whites.

Even if you ignore this and just want to do some grug level analysis, whites are obviously the best looking, most friendly, pro-social etc people on average if you combine all traits considered positive. They might not be the highest on any particular trait, but as a collection of traits that societies should value, and individuals value in terms of sexual market value etc whites clearly have the highest overall rating.

The only argument against whites being the 'superior' race is if you're some kind of extreme anti-civilisation, anti-technology guy who thinks everything outside of a hunter-gatherer tribe is degeneration. But if we're being honest those people are larping and don't really believe that.

[–][deleted]  (3 children)

[deleted]

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 6 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 0 fun7 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

    Evolution will naturally select for the best traits from a bigger gene pool in the case of America.

    Yeah, right. South America is a model for this, they're the ubermensch.

    [–]SoylentCapitalist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

    Evolution will naturally select for the best traits from a bigger gene pool in the case of America.

    Thinking more about this you're right in that my conclusion is wrong. The average person isn't capable of doing what is best from an eugenics perspective. The only way it would work is if a competent government intervenes and establishes eugenic policies.

    [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

    Yes. Natural selection pressures disappeared as medicine improved, and especially since society started valuing only economics rather than Rank (in its true sense, although obviously there was previously mostly only Blood-Rank which isn't 1:1 with true Rank but it's much closer than Money-Rank)