you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

under whose reign

She had zero real power.

[–]WhiteZealotWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (5 children)

She had a lot of power in the form of political capital. She could have ended non-White immigration at any time by making a formal declaration that it be ended and explaining why it must end. The people would have been with her and the anti-White politicians would have relented under all the pressure exerted on them.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

She could have ended non-White immigration at any time by making a formal declaration that it be ended and explaining why it must end.

That is delusional. That would discredit her in the eyes of the entire cultural elite, turn all media and institutions against the monarchy, and result in its abolishment.

[–]WhiteZealotWhite Nationalist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

No, a large majority of the people and at least half the politicians would not allow that to happen. If she really fought with everything available to her, she and her backers would have prevailed.

[–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You don't understand the status of the monarchy in Britain or the political situation there. The monarchy is barely tolerated even by the conservative politicians, and is only grudgingly accepted as an aesthetic symbol. If you want to see what happens when a figure within the establishment tries to oppose it, you can take a look at the case of Enoch Powell - he was very popular, had political connections, and the people were with him, but he was nevertheless completely isolated by his own party and failed to accomplish anything.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

No, the monarchy is only tolerated in Britain because it has been neutered, liberalized, and supports the liberal values modern Britain represents. If it started challenging them then it would be abolished.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

If it started challenging them then it would be abolished.

What other choice do they got? A Monarchy in a 99% Non-White England sounds just as useless as not existing at all.

They got power to at least try and do something. If it fails, then the country can go down in dignity. Otherwise, they're just cowards.

The British Army swears loyalty to the King. If they refuse orders and rather defend diversity, then it should tell you the nation is finally lost.