you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 5 insightful - 1 fun5 insightful - 0 fun6 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Whites being committed to fairness is a biased take. Everyone is, generally speaking, committed to something that they regard as right, even the neoliberals so to speak - they don't think to be evil. Obviously what's right differs between different cultures and it happened that the whites developed over the last 3 centuries a fixation on personal liberty, which can lead to what's called "fairness" in the sense that as society we tend to remove the obstacles to the exercise of such liberty - the so called rule of law. That's not fair for, let's says, the Muslim, which consider highly unfair the fact that people are allowed to live outside the Sharia law.

About the conquering drive, that's more realistic but also highly dependent on a series of factors. Mongols are highly aggressive and conquer-minded, as well as Persians; the same was true for some native American cultures. Chinese people on the other hand basically never engaged in external imperialism and the same is true for the Africans. However I doubt that the whites as a race are particularly conquer-minded. I think that it was mostly a result of several factors: Europe being culturally more or less unified under Christianity but politically divided promoted a fierce competition for centuries, and most of the colonies were indeed taken in order to get a competitive advantage in Europe. Christianity also, as much as Islam, is an universalistic religion and justify the conquest of non-christian people for the purpose of conversion. Islam and Christianity, as a fact, are the most aggressive religion on the earth (be aware of the fact that the decolonisation process started alongside tge secularisation of the West). Lastly there's the Roman empire example, which is more or less the foundational myth of the whites, that promotes the idea that is a duty to expand the civilization and that conquering people is a good way to do so.

All in all the whites are conquer-minded and fair as a result of their history, which could in turn be the result of their particular racial make up, bit honestly who knows? And why should it matters?

Ps Spencer is retarded.

[–][deleted] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Every group is committed to things they regard as right, but whites organized societies around principals of fairness and codified them into their laws. Ending slavery, one man/one vote, due process etc. Whites have even taken to treating animals with certain rights. Have black and brown done the same, to a comparable degree?

I'd say it matters simply to understand our own nature and the nature of other races.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Blacks and brown never developed the idea of personal liberty and free market.