(((Namecheap))) drops conpro for 'unlawful' speech

submitted by send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]oligarchracy 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

A lot of jewish shills and glowies were really active on that site from what I saw. That is where the “unlawful” speech seemed to be coming from. You have to understand there are jews that make their entire living by doing shit like that, and with US domestic security in the hands of Jewish supremacists like Garfinkle and Mayorkas you can bet many of them now work hand in hand with the “feds”.

Im still extremely keen on hearing about this “retired” fed and others that helped groom the buffalo shooter. The media has predictably ignored this explosive revelation, or even reported misinformation by claiming its a sign that feds are infiltrated by WNs.

This is why I wouldn't allow known shills like radical centrist or salos to post here. Its asking for trouble. They arent fed posting necessarily, but they are playing some kind of game.

On the other hand shills like radicalcentrist can also teach us about jidf style tactics and make it easier to spot others. I learned a lot from observing them on reddit and ruqqus.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

or even reported misinformation by claiming its a sign that feds are infiltrated by WNs.

I hear that a lot (essentially that the fash are gaining jobs at the FBI), or even that the agencies gave rise to the whole alt-right. What do you think of that? Does it hold water or no?

[–]oligarchracy 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Of course it doesnt. If it was the media would be all over it. They already have to invent white supremacists to compensate for the lack of actual ones, hence calling every white person who isnt an aggressively woke clownworld shitlib a white supremacist.

If there was even a remote chance that this fed who groomed this buffalo shooter was an actual white nationalist mole at some federal agency, the media would never shut up about it, and Merrick Garfinkle and a bunch of congressional jews would be launching investigations. Instead the story was buried aside from them putting out a few bullshit pieces implying the agent was a literal white nationalist before dropping the issue(which they would never do if it was true).

In reality there are basically three options to what happened.

  1. this fed was attempting to entrap this kid and/or infiltrate online groups, and it backfired horribly and is now being covered up.

  2. They literally attempted to groom a nationalist mass shooter in order to discredit nationalists and increase gun control and censorship, but they fucked up when the actual shooter referenced the groomers in his manifesto and some law enforcement/ local media discovered one actually was a fed and spilled the beans, which wasnt supposed to happen.

  3. This was some overzealous Jew activist type who was attempting to discredit nationalists and push for censorship by inciting people(which we have absolutely seen happen on websites), who also just happened to be a retired fed bureaucrat of some kind, and again the media or some law enforcement caught wind of it and spilled the beans.

Number 1 seems to be the most likely to me, but I wouldnt rule out the other scenarios. If any of the three are shown to have occured it would be a scandal of epic proportions that would be devasting to the feds. Could you imagine if black activists found out this mass shooting was incited by some federal agent or online Jewish activist? The fact this has so far been covered up only futher illustrates the extent of Jewish control over both media and federal law enforcement.

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I remember seeing all this talk about programs from Garland and the rest trying to remove any WNs from agencies from a year ago or so, but I can't confirm if what they found was true.

Number three was true to an extent with Joshua Goldberg, good thing that was noted.

Otherwise they'd believe that all of this is organic, which I had doubt for when weaponry and WN sites were listed in the manifesto. I could only ever see that as non-glowing if it was him stupidly telling everyone about it.