If you could repeal just one law/act/amendment today, what would it be and why?

submitted by curious2 from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (9 children)

Whichever one is responsible for jews being in the country, expel them and everything can be fixed.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

So the 19th Amendment.

Take away Women's right to vote, which would instantly collapse Feminism and all other "equal rights" movements that leads to diversity.

No more forced equality means the strongest Men take over, who can enforce border control.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (7 children)

lol nah

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

Honestly, there's a correlation.

The most Jewed nations right now are the ones with low birth rates. Yet how did we to get to that point if Men lost control of their Women?

The focus on "stronk independent women" , abortions and birth control means Jews were able to execute their second plan: mass replacement of European countries through non-white immigration.

For further proof of this, it's also Women who are holding signs that say "refugees welcome".

https://files.catbox.moe/hiwub6.jpg

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Not at all. Jews were already in America and causing problems LONG before 1919. Blaming muh women is just virgins coping.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

What kind of problems, and what was the reaction back then vs now?

They weren't going to replace White people in 1790 when the first act of congress literally said only Whites could be citizens for example. The biggest damage to America took place much later, when concepts of equality where actually taken seriously instead of being laughed at. Now look at America? It's almost Neo-Brazil.

Blaming muh women is just virgins coping.

Not cope. A better question is why are you caping for Women at all?

It's obvious we're in a baby crisis that's being exploited by those pushing immigrants as a band-aid, yet the opposite gender refuses to make sacrifices to fix this. It completely goes against evolution and the only solution is to have Men reinforce these gender roles since doing nothing puts us deeper down the hole.

I don't care if that hurts Women's feelings. Facts are facts. Even if that means ripping them away from TikTok or University, drastic measures have to be made if you don't want to go extinct.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

Jews have genocided dozens of peoples throughout history, it's what they've been doing for thousands of years. 99% of them have had nothing to do with feminism and equality, these things are just particular symptoms of jews being in power.

When you are fighting a war is it preferable to kill the commanders, generals and other leaders or to wipeout specific units you personally have some prejudice against because you don't like X type of equipment, tactic etc? Obviously chasing units you personally don't like is retarded and it'll always be best to kill the people responsible for organising the army. 'Cavalry is gay, chase the horses guys' vs 'Try to get Alexander, he's the greatest general the world has ever known', I know who I'd listen to.

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Jews have genocided dozens of peoples throughout history, it's what they've been doing for thousands of years.

Why should I believe that the Founding Fathers of the U.S would have been so incompetent, that a small Jewish population would have overthrown their country and proceed to wipe them out without resistance?

May I remind you that the Founding Demographics had beat the British Empire, fought and beat the Ottomans (who were enslaving Americans by the way), expanded their own territory through either conquest or tactical purchases (i.e Louisiana/Alaska) and they designed a political system that gave Americans the right to bear arms and limit the power of the President from being too tyrannical?

Context is important, otherwise, you're acting like the U.S was always some feeble colony that could have been controlled by outsiders, but history clearly tells us that was not the case until Isolationism was abandoned, and the U.S began whoring itself to the highest bidder and losing sight of what made them so rich and powerful in the first place.

When you are fighting a war is it preferable to kill the commanders, generals and other leaders or to wipeout specific units you personally have some prejudice against because you don't like X type of equipment, tactic etc? Obviously chasing units you personally don't like is retarded and it'll always be best to kill the people responsible for organising the army. 'Cavalry is gay, chase the horses guys' vs 'Try to get Alexander, he's the greatest general the world has ever known', I know who I'd listen to.

Both can be accomplished. The U.S having a traditional/conservative origin acted like a shield against those "commanders" who were always planning to subvert and destroy the country. For example, you mentioned genocides so why not explain to me why Communism never took root in the U.S, despite it happening in other White countries like Russia and the bloody death toll it caused there? Once again, you can find texts from 50+ years ago of Americans criticizing the movement, because it either went against their religion, capitalist values, or would have spelled the end of their gun rights.