I hope you realize that the Middle East was more or less White before the Muslims flooded in and took over. Are you gonna try and tell me that the Byzantines were Turks because they existed largely in Asia Minor?

I would rather get back to you on this one.

And there's a HUGE difference between military invasion and subtle subterfuge. Afghanistan in the 80s, before the Taliban took over, was a degenerate cesspit that emulated Western nations. It took a Soviet invasion for a force to rise up and overthrow the subterfuge of Judaic influence.

Sure, but why is it Islam in particular that drives these people to clean up their own house and unite against their oppressors' so much? Iran underwent the same thing with the revolution of the 1970s. Or Lebanon and Syria. They're always been more fanatical and hostile against letting foreigners take over.

If Christians are so evil and bad, why did Christians massively support Hitler? Mussolini? etc. and heavily resist Communists and other direct Jewish military intervention?

Not all of them did, and if the July plot is taken at face value, then these same people who initially liked Hitler would have also turned on him when it was convenient.

Hitler was at least very smart to recognize that the state needs to give all power to someone who actually cares more about race & nationalism, then risk it on sharing it with rivals who are corruptible or have weak emotions.

True Fascism is literally "facts don't care about your feelings", and if I was Fuhrer, why would I trust someone who believes a book about talking snakes or burning bushes to be real? My first instinct is that they are schizo or hear voices in their head.

And why is the onus to rise up against ZOG on Christians alone? If Pagans and gaytheists are so based and redpilled why haven't they risen up and done what you imply Christians should be doing if they're so based? And btw, Christians ARE doing such things; groups like the Amish are direct slaps in the face to the WEF and UN and their kike agenda.

Atheists have if we use China as a benchmark, and to a lesser extent, Japan.

And lol at the Amish. On one hand, they're actually the only group of Christian I respect for living the lo-fi life and minding their own business. But it's also a double edge sword against them. They reject technology which keeps them in a dumbed down state.

When China pumps out genetically engineered Gigachads en masse, the poor Amish Farmer wont have anything to resist them with.

"South America and Africa being Christian is bad because... it just is okay!!!" If Christians are so weak shouldn't you be celebrating the inferior races being "weaker"? And no Christian groups I'm aware of wanted to import Africans en masse to Europe.

I actually feel pity for the lesser races. I think an African or an Indian should stick to their native shamanism instead of being forced to wear crosses or read bibles.

And you can't think of a major Christian group who supports importing Blacks? Um... how about the Pope?

https://www.americamagazine.org/faith/2019/09/29/pope-francis-reminds-christians-migrants-and-refugees-should-be-welcomed-around

Now contrast the Pope's comments with that of the Buddhist Dalai Lama?

https://www.france24.com/en/20180912-dalai-lama-says-europe-belongs-europeans

Are you fucking retarded or something? The Greeks and Romans didn't give a shit about race either. They didn't care if Blacks or Muslims lived in their empire or race mixed.

This is a topic I would personally want to research. Because they did care if both Empires didn't actually end up being completely mixed race in the end.

This is a meaningless statement that you didn't even bother to back up.

It's actually on point. What did both Marx and Jesus do? They both changed the world forever, by coming up with teachings that would go on to destroy millions of lives, even longer after they're death.

Had both Men not existed, Humanity would have been in Space by now.

So you think degeneracy is okay? You think holding people accountable for morally reprehensible actions or motives is "LITERALLY JUST LIKE WHITE GUILT!"? "White Guilt" is built off the premise that White people are bad because we did things everyone else does, or better yet that we committed fictional crimes that never happened. Original Sin is the idea that humans will always be imperfect and fall short of God, because we are inherently flawed. It has nothing to do with "ancestral crimes" despite the constant connections made by dipshits like yourself

Why would I be born with degeneracy? And why does worshipping a dead desert man somehow hold all the solutions to this?

It's far from having any scientific weight, and it instead, it makes humans fearful. Like if anyone doesn't believe in Jesus, they're automatically going to Hell right? Regardless if nothing about their original sins stopped them from being a good or even contributing person on Earth.

Another quite meaningless statement, that not only ignores 90% of what I said but also betrays your childlike understanding of Christianity yet again.

Everything you say about Christianity hinges on this idea that Jesus self-sacrifice is actually worth anything. It's not. I have no valid reason to believe I'm a sinner and even more bizarre, why worship a god who cursed his own creations when they were born? I actually can't think of any other religion with such resentment for its own followers.

This is untrue and retarded on a number of levels. Firstly, you said Christianity is suicidal then immediately praise a religion, and a specific idea within that religion, that inspires suicide bombers and other terrorists, as well as a doctrine that states that the afterlife is only for those who die in battle. How do you not see that as "suicidal"?

Because the suicide bomber is still dying for something that affects us in real life and can result in actual political change. Whereas someone dying in the name of Jesus only removes themselves from existence. Like the Jim Jones Kool-Aid cult.

Secondly, only those saved through belief, action, etc. (depending on the sectarian understanding of salvation) are saved and go to Heaven. Not to mention, those terrorists and viking raiders you praised earlier in your "point" didn't contribute much in life, not to Whites anyway, considering those actions directly harm(ed) Whites.

Oh cool. So some murderer or rapist could say praise Jesus on their death bed and go to heaven. But a Scientist who lived a life of moving humanity forward is going to hell because he just didn't see any evidence for any god? Pathetic.

Well, first off, unironically yes. And if you throw a shitfit, Muslims literally believe that Allah told Mohammed to rape little girls. Hellenists literally believed that the Gods literally lived on a mountain and did shit like fuck mortals and mess with crops and shit. Norse pagans literally believed a fuckhuge snake and a fuckhuge wolf would fight and end the world. Ironic that you praise these religions that are/were far more superstitious and illogical than Christianity while chastising Christianity for being "not credible", lmao.

As long as Christians believe their bible is god inspired, while also claiming only their god exists, they deserve the ridicule. Because just like the criticism of the original sin, there is no scientific way to evaluate this religion, yet it's still being treated as fact for some reason.

According to whom? Your ass? This is quite a bold assumption considering even through decades of fascism and even subsequent communist and/or globohomo control Germany, Italy, etc. stayed a vast majority Christian.

The only religion I could see sticking around, is possibly a cult dedicated to Adolf Hitler. And that's because he was actually a real person who came and did all the things he wanted with facts to back it up.

If someone still believes in Jesus or Muhammad despite never personally answering any calls in a thousand years, the joke is on them.

How so? Seeing your citizenry as worthless clumps of cells, akin to living robots whose only purpose is to reproduce is completely antithetical to "looking after" the population. The Soviets did the whole antitheism thing and as a more or less direct result genocided their citizens en masse and treated them as prisoners or livestock.

Not true, and in fact, the Soviet model staunchly rejected evolution in favor of their own pseudoscience.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lysenkoism

And even for the times they may have gotten Science right, they were still true believers in equality, which meant they would never elevate themselves past poverty.

National Socialism wanted to breed better humans, which is only possible when you realize that inferior and superior populations exist. When you have super human beings, your nation can only keep going up in terms of healthcare, intelligence, physical prowess, wealth etc.

We haven't gone extinct yet. And cures for cancer likely exist, but are being suppressed by der Jude. All in all you've managed to do nothing productive, aside form exposing the ideological core of your beliefs, based in liberalism and Marxism. Your ideology is wholly materialist and nothing like National Socialism in any regard. You unironically come across as a leftoid LARPing as a facsist/NatSoc.

It makes no sense to believe in a god who has shown to never intervene whenever a race is in trouble.

Fascism only ever made great strides because there was smart Men in the past who could read current events, and understand no divine help was ever going to rescue humanity.