you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

It seems to me that you are using Yockey's terminology here, but I am fairly certain that he was still an ethnonationalist.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (4 children)

He was Pan-Europeanist but it is clear he considered certain non-Aryan individuals integratable.

[–]MarkimusNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

it is clear he considered certain non-Aryan individuals integratable

What are you basing that on? I've read everything that is available of his and I don't know how you got this impression, he only considered a small amount of slavs as capable of joining Europe let alone total foreigners who have no proximity and exposure to Europe. He was more 'strict' than most pro-white people.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

“It is the numbers that create these racial questions. If a tiny group is involved, it will disappear; if a group of significant numbers is present, separated by a Cultural barrier from the surrounding population, it will not.”

[–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I looked up this quote and it seems to me that Yockey is describing a specific, factual dynamic, rather than prescribing a political platform of deliberately integrating different groups.