How do we counteract anti natalism aimed at whites?

submitted by send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist from self.debatealtright

I stumbled upon this video today

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7_B9UuEp51w

As I watched it really struck me as quite sophisticated propaganda. It's easy to see this Anna Akana character didn't write the script herself. You can tell some really well connected people looking at the 'cat lady' meme and it's effectiveness at shaming career women needed to figure out some counter propaganda. There's also some attempt to counteract the wine aunt meme by making the wine aunt a wise and funny 'God' character.

(I wish I could see the writing rooms for these seemingly self produced globo homo youtube channels.)

So how do we counteract this stuff? Obviously DAR members and their families can see through this video and understand the grift but the video isn't aimed at us. It's aimed at young women trying to decide if they want careers or motherhood. I found it interesting that at the end she says she 'might' have kids after a long list of excuses. To me that's the same thing as saying she's never going to have kids. 90% of women that delay children to have a career end up as cat ladies or have way way fewer children then they would have otherwise. Women greatly over inflate their window of fertility and mate attraction.

all 4 comments
sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun

[–]radicalcentristNational Centrism 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The harsh answer is it requires restricting feminism.

The world before the 1960s promoted the idea that Women are happier when they actually find a mate. But once Women had been given the same access to Men's spaces, then the biological pattern had been disrupted.

I also remember seeing an article posted the other day, about how girls are greatly rewarded more in schools than boys. Especially as they're the ones being encouraged to go into the Maths & Sciences whereas boys have to work 2x as hard for it.

Reverse that, and push girls to learn about home economics instead. Our society treats them as career people, when biologically, they were always suppose to look after and raise children first.

[–]Erasmus 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

We really ought to tie the ability to vote to fertility. Being on a prescription for birth control means no vote. Young women who choose a career instead of children remove themselves from the voting pool and enhance the voting power of men.

If you choose to abandon your responsibility to the future, then you don't get to participate in shaping it.

[–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I think the dichotomy you are speaking about is wrong. It's not about having or non having kids, it's about how much kids you are going to have. Most couples have indeed at least a child, but a couple is formed by two individuals. Which means that if they have less than one child the population is going to decrease. However when you have multiple children you are going to split up economic means and get additional economic burden. That's the problem. Most whites sets with 1-2 kids and call it a day. That's not enough. But in order to keep social status having a single child is better. We would need something like ancient regime institutions - planned marriage, military jobs for any make except the first, things like that - to counter that trend.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The best people to ask this question of are you know, actual women. Unfortunately this entire website doesnt seem to have any aside from a couple dykes that were apparently active on some anti trans sub, I think it was lgbq drop the t or something.