Intriguing also is the possibility of the rather unusual 'Gendron' being a Jewish surname: (see the graphic posted at https://communities.win/c/ConsumeProduct/p/15HvBndh5M/x/c )

Here, I've only ever heard people label Carlson a cuck because of his incomplete conception of the motives behind mass immigration.

Carlson's understanding is simply that the Democrats push mass immigration because it will hand them a victory in all Federal (and many southern state) elections. And while that generally seems to be true, it's clearly incomplete. At most, that's surely just the icing on the cake for the Democrats.

It explains not why Republicans also push mass immigration, even when it clearly benefits Democrats at least insofar as elections are concerned.

Nor does it explain why so many people see it as bad and yet believe that it is good that it is bad. That some sort of just desserts or well-deserved punishment is coming for America as a nation-state and/or the whole European race.

Chalking it down to a long-term Democratic election strategy is simply too narrow an analysis. At the very least, the Republican, 'Right-wing' version and the explicitly anti-White version ('It is indeed bad, but it is good that it is bad, because what is bad for you is good because you are bad') simply aren't accounted for through this simplistic lens.

So I am not exactly sure what the OP means in Tucker 'talking about ethnic replacement'. To my understanding, Tucker has only ever been aware of one of the (at the very least) three components (pathological altruism probably constitutes something of a fourth) of support for mass immigration. That is, that he has talked about importing a new straight-D voting electorate to replace less reliable ones. But 'American' is not reducible to 'American voter'; there is surely more to this than a mere Democrat power-play.

Of course, even coming close to the reality of the matter would be enough to generate a backlash. But surely Tucker could then just respond that he rejects everything about The Great Replacement except the idea of it as election strategy and powerplay? Which wouldn't even be a lie.

Next, some have indeed noticed also that the 'manifesto' could be construed as serving some sort of function. For at least two reasons. Firstly, a whole list of websites are listed as having inspired him. Naturally, having a 'terrorist' promote a website is perfect for getting it taken down. Second, because he meticulously lists everything that he obtained, which is again perfect for getting all sorts of things banned.