Abortionist Riot Thread

submitted by LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 7 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 0 fun8 insightful - 1 fun -  (15 children)

I imagine that these protests will be far more damaging and entertaining than 2020 BLM, since a far larger portion of the population feels attacked; that is, feminists of all stripes, rather than a mere ethnic minority and their sympathizers.

You obviously have little understanding of the current political situation if you can think something so completely wrong.

[–]shilldetector 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (8 children)

Exactly. BLM was secretly hated by most white people. This ruling would have the exact opposite effect, completely alienating whites who would otherwise be sympathetic. It would make the GOP completely radioactive to women and would probably finish off the GOP as a viable party long term, but not because the GOP wouldnt stick up for whites and sane Americans, but because it will be seen as a party of religious extremists, and this will translate to any right wing populist movement.

The fact alt righters think this is great illustrates the problem with a movement that almost exclusively consists of males, a high percentage of whom are probably incels. I hate to be an asshole, but thats just the reality of it.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

My main point is that anti racism and black victimology is the #1 issue for progressive activists and it is the ideology the ruling class pushes the hardest. A feminist issue isn't going to cause the nation to spiral into mass riots and destruction like BLM riots of 2020.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I agree, a bunch of pink haired feminists protesting isnt going to result in mass riots. Sure Antifa may do their normal rioting in their normal strongholds and use this ruling as an excuse, but theyd do that regardless of this ruling.

What this ruling will do is blunt GOP gains because of Dem incomptence and hostility towards whites. It takes the attention of Democrat malevolence in shit like this dystopian council on disinformation and whites who were getting sick of the Dems will continue to support them because they think the GOP is run by religious extremists.

It'll also give the dems the excuse they want to increase the size of the supreme court to roll back conservative gains on the court.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

The fact alt righters think this is great illustrates the problem with a movement that almost exclusively consists of males, a high percentage of whom are probably incels. I hate to be an asshole, but thats just the reality of it.

Any dissident worth his salt would support the destabilization of the system. If the left goes apeshit and starts a bigger ruckus than the summer of Floyd, it will further drive the US into a tailspin, especially considering that its in the grip of an inflationary spiral.

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Any dissident worth his salt would support the destabilization of the system.

This wont destabilize the system, it will strengthen the system because people who increasingly hate the system will be convinced that the alternative is even worse, they'll think well fuck, if the Republicans are a bunch of religious extremists, than what the hell are these crazies to the right of them. It'll help keep people on the shitlib plantation. The system is going to collapse regardless, but the question is what comes after, and if people think dissidents are the American taliban they will be less likely to support them. We win by being viewed as less batshit crazy and extremist than the left wing extremists burning down American cities and pulling people out of cars and beating them half to death on the street because they dont publicly cry for every black thug that gets killed while doing something thuggish. We win by being the voice of reason and the ones people trust to save western civilization from anarcho tyranny and left wing authoritarianism.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

and would probably finish off the GOP as a viable party long term,

How is that a bad thing? The GOP is a blocker party for alt right ideas. That's it's only purpose. The GOP is just as bad for white people as the demoncrats.

but because it will be seen as a party of religious extremists

It's already seen that way. Your comments are weird. You seem to be implying that the only reason the GOP is losing is because of bad decisions and bad optics towards women. Dude the GOP loses because it's set up as controlled opposition to democrats. It's there to make democratic ideas seem reasonable. The GOP is never going to listen to our ideas if they win. Whenever they get in power they ignore dissident ideas and push uni party central banking ideas. The last thing we want is the GOP continuing to exist as a real political entity in the eyes of normies. It needs to fail. Stop thinking that elections, 'constitutionalism', or politicians are going to save us. That's your first problem right there.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

It's there to make democratic ideas seem reasonable

The role of the GOP is to concede power slowly. They take radical policies from democrats and slowly normalize them over 10-15 years for the opposing masses. Whites are stuck on the republican plantation.

This scotus leak wreaks of astroturfing. Never heard of a scotus leak before and overturning RvW came out of nowhere. Christcucks have been bitching about it for decades. Everyone should knows it's not gonna stick. Democrats and feminazis will just legally maneuver around scotus. This whole thing wreaks of jew shenanigans.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This whole thing wreaks of jew shenanigans.

Wouldn't even be surprised if the Jew Breyer or the Jew Kagan leaked it themselves. There were even websites set up in advanced (no doubt by jews) to oppose the ruling.

https://dailystormer.cn/wp-content/uploads/2022/05/1651630549305.png

[–]shilldetector 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I dont care about saving the GOP, I want it to go away. The problem is that if the GOP is successfully labled as religious extremists, a lot of normies will think that whatever is to the right of the GOP must be a hundred times worse, some American version of isis, and the Jewish media will do everything they can to reinforce that notion.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

Let's look at the figures I provided.

Blacks = officially 13.4%;

Women [irrespective of race] = officially 50.8%;

The latter is almost quadruple the size of the former.

In order for your reasoning to be correct, that a perceived attack on all blacks is more of an affront than a perceived attack on all women, each woman would effectively have to possess around four times less victimhood than the average black. At that point, the outrage would only be equivalent to 2020 BLM.

You know that that's wrong: even if the average black person, male or female, is assigned a greater victimhood value than the average woman, it is nowhere near four times higher.

The fact of the matter is remarkably simple: even if blacks possess more per capita victimhood than women in general, there is no way in hell that that would compensate for the sheer difference in total numbers.

Floyd's death was perceived as an attack on 13.4% of Americans.

The SCOTUS decision was perceived as an attack on 50.8% of Americans.

The higher level of victimhood assigned to blacks, while narrowing the difference somewhat, doesn't narrow anywhere near all of it, such that these riots will be only equivalent to, or lesser than, 2020 BLM.

From the average American's perspective, the SCOTUS just declared war on a majority of Americans.

[–]NeoRail 3 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 0 fun4 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

White Americans are also approximately 50% of the population. How does your analysis account for that?

Mathematics is not a useful tool for answering this type of question.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Even if we reframe the above to be perceived attacks on:

Blacks + non-black sympathizers with the 'oppose anti-black racism' cause = (Those who view themselves as under attack plus those who feel they need to defend those who believe they are under attack now constitute something greater than 13.4%)

Women + non-women sympathizers with the 'oppose anti-woman sexism' cause = (Same as above, but now constituting something greater than 50.8%)

The latter still surely constitute a far greater portion of the population even if it isn't strictly the 'almost quadruple' you replied to. There's simply a whole lot more potential rioters this time around, and we can already see that there is a pretty heavy male presence in some of these videos reinforcing that targeted demographic.

I also have no idea why people are bothering to make these kinds of comments. Does it look like I made this post to argue with various people whose views are warped by their animus towards blacks greatly exceeding their love of Whites, such that they are willing to harm the latter in order to also harm the former? Or with people who are conflicted between their social progressive viewpoints and their White ethnonationalism and thus experience cognitive dissonance when their interests clash, i.e. on the matter of White abortion, which is practically what Ethnocrat has done since he moved from the more general pro-abortion stance of libtard trash like Spencer to the 'What race is it?' stance much more congruent with the standard DR stance on the matter?

Now, I don't know what your view is, other than that you have felt unsympathetic enough to have taken a stab at my argument that 2022 is going to be much more riotous than 2020. But I think it's clear that I don't want an information/updates thread to be full of counter-signalling from people like Ethnocrat (who I presume read absolutely nothing of my post, and reflexively commented because this event creates cognitive dissonance in anyone who is 'Far-Right' and yet liberal on abortion ('the abortionists are right to protest... but they're also progressive nutcases who I oppose on practically everything else, I feel uneasy considering this topic and don't want to be reminded about it!') and JuliusCaesar225 (who I presume only read two sentences before immediately nitpicking at one of them). Low-effort comments on an 'effortpost'? That's not my kind of thing.

[–]NeoRail 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

This is a debate forum, not social media - there is nothing to "counter-signal" here, there are only different views. I agree that some of the comments in this thread are low effort, but that does not necessarily mean that they are wrong. At any rate, if you are presenting updates on the development of events here, there will be nothing for people to disagree with or complain about. Your analysis, however - which, in some respects, as I suggested earlier, is in my opinion incorrect - is not immune to criticism.

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I'm not sure why you think these percentages have any relevance to what you are claiming. America is over 60% white, therefore the discrimination and attacks on whites should be causing mass outrage and riots but it doesn't work that way.