Roe v Wade set to be overturn

submitted by Richard_Parker from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

There are a lot of rebuttals to this from the left. That being that:

-Roe v. Wade is beneficial to nearly everybody, and lifesaving

-"Someone else has to violate it first" (in regards to only allowing abortion in emergencies/circumstances of rape)

-"Men shouldn't be making laws about women's bodies"

Who can be a help here?

[–]Richard_Parker[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Are you talking about as policy matter or in terms of a legal argument whether the Constitution actually can be reasonably held to hold abortion as a Constitutional riht?

[–]Fonched 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

Mostly policy matter, all these arguments on their own are all I'm concerned with.

Forgot two more, and these are:

-The whole "pro-lifers aren't really pro-life" because they aren't protective in other ways

-Bans on abortion only prevent safe abortions from occurring