you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]JuliusCaesar225Nationalist + Socialist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (8 children)

Republican states are the most white. In fact the states with the highest black population are all Red.

Vast majority of Americans are against this. Conservatives have been able to gain traction because the modern Left has become so bad that Republicans have begun to look better in the culture war. Rather than the usual stupid religious right nonsense the current conservative culture war was against things like critical race theory, trans, pro crime/riots. Considering how hard conservatives go after abortion you would think there was a huge support to ban it but it is only a minority of conservatives who consider this a passionate issue. But who cares because it will "trigger the libs" I guess.

[–]LGBTQIAIDSAnally Injected Death Sentence 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

Overlooking an opportunity to cut one of the many causes decreasing White births just because a bunch of non-whites largely self-segregating in shitholes like Atlanta, where there are almost no Whites to begin with, seems pointless to me. For example, if you look at channels like https://www.youtube.com/user/securityofone it is easy to see that plenty of places in which blacks live have practically no non-black populations whatsoever. Pray tell, how many non-blacks can you find in any of his videos?

The gains made by having more Whites in Red states seems to me to vastly outweigh the losses incurred by having more blacks in (and mostly only in select areas of, at that) Red states, and that's all that's really at stake here, because in Blue states business goes on as usual, with abortion continuing in places like California and Illinois (nobody is going to take abortion away from the countless blacks in Chicago and Detroit, or the countless Hispanics in California) with or without RvW.

Another obvious plus side is that it will help prevent emigration from the more populous Blue states to smaller Red states, which heavily threatens Federal elections even further still, since large numbers of Democrats can flip more sparsely populated states Blue. They talk about doing this all the time in order to deprive the Republicans of each Red state's two guaranteed Senate seats. American elections are largely winner takes all, which means that if Democrats spread themselves strategically throughout Republican America (and they by far have the demographic advantage, having won every popular vote since 1988) they will simply seize the whole country. But such plans are unlikely to amount to anything if the Democrats find life in Republican America intolerable and thus choose to remain in places like California.

We're already seeing the effects of this in places like Nevada, to where plenty of the Californian garbage is spreading. But reversing RvW will in turn help to further polarize the country into a 'Red America' and 'Blue America' with separate realities, by making abortion an additional wedge issue to drive them further apart. Current wedge issues like CRT are clearly not enough to destabilize or divide the country.

'Triggering the libs' does far more for us than whatever DeSantis or Youngkin or some other Repub has done regarding CRT or 'transwomen' in women's sports or some other 'current year' battle which the Republicans always lose on in the end. BLM's bullshit in 2020 did wonders in reversing the Republicans' rapid decline in polling when Covid came, and if the Left-liberals come out to protest something that by and large doesn't even concern them unless they live in a Red state, it will do the same. The Republicans need to be far more destabilizing, polarizing and provocative, and far less bipartisan both for their own good and ours. Bipartisanship just makes both parties seem like two wings of the same System bird, and does nothing to break up the country in ways from which Whites can benefit. I don't want the GOP to convince the Democrats to adopt their position on something like CRT, thus winning part of the 'culture war'; I want the GOP to push things that the Democrats absolutely hate, thus impossibilizing the continuation of a singular America. I want them to push the types of policies that lead Left-liberals to burn and loot, clash with police, declare 'autonomous zones' like the CHAZ/CHOP, force businesses to board up or close in their own areas and otherwise convince others that both sides can't live together anymore. A CalExit consequent of extreme levels of polarization, for example, would be overwhelmingly good for Whites. Whereas I can't see anything really positive out of defeating CRT, since the centrist/colourblind position that CRT is replacing was similarly bad and in some ways is even worse for us. CRT is leading to new forms of segregation, the only difference between 'old' and 'new' segregation being that they call the shots rather than Whites, for example.

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

At first I agreed with you on this, because it's a good argument. The right could and should be sanctioning the left any way legally possible. It's good for us when the left chimps out. Why stop at Roe v. Wade? They could overturn Obergefell v. Hodges and watch the left literally attempt insurrection and Self-immolate in protest.

Then I got to thinking about it more and I disagree because the justices and republicans have no such motivation. They are only doing this because their pastor gives them sermons about how democrats are the real racists for aborting black babies.

[–]Richard_Parker[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (5 children)

This needed to be done in 93 with Casey, to put an end to judicial activism. The Constitution has outlived its usefulness and I am fully post-democratic in my thinking but there is an advantage to stemming the tide. Roe v Wade style legislating from the bench is what made gay marriage possible....

[–]Blackbrownfreestuff 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Under what law are marriage licenses for butt bandits required in my state? No such law was passed when anal marriage licenses were issued.

[–]Richard_Parker[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

SCOTUS "discerned" the Constitutional right to gay marriage in Obergefell.v Hodges, in the same for of judicial activism seen in Roe v Wade et Al

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

The constitution was admirable to some degree in its first draft when it restricted voting to land-owning white males only. The continuous amendments over time have rendered it into a shitshow.

[–]Richard_Parker[S] 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The problem with requiring ownership of land is that it exacerbates problem of generatiobal wealth. The system envisioned in Starship Troopers is far better. Some poor people can be brilliant, capable and so on whilst some welarhy individuals can be degenrates, fools, cretins, idiots, etc.

[–]negrogreBeing black is anti-white 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

The constitution was fucked the moment it was treated like a holy document.