you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

You're intentions are honest here. You want to find a way to get around Jewish tyranny to help whites. However, if you do this long enough you lift up blacks and degenerate whites. Your banking equation leaves out the fact that over time millions of dollars would be witheld from whites that would have earned it under mono racial conditions. It's not moral or ethical to racially suppress whites in favor of other races. It's also not moral or ethical to lift up blacks artificially on the backs of another race. They can lift themselves up.

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Thanks!
It only appears to be in favor of blacks. Overall you favor whites. So you're in fact not artificially lifting up blacks, but rather you're supressing them while appearing to be favoring them. It is an unintuitive paradox. Notice how 45 whites were chosen while only 40 blacks were chosen. This is while assuming equal population sizes of 100 whites and 100 blacks. So while it may appear to be that we're lifting up blacks, in actuality we end up with a 45% acceptance rate for whites and only a 40% acceptance rate for blacks. This can obviously be scaled to an arbitrary disparity in favor of whites (within reasonable ranges).

I agree entirely with your point about mono racial conditions, and we can aim towards that goal, but this method of discrimination is aimed at solving a problem within multi racial conditions.

[–]LetssavethefirsworldReturn to Jesus 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Only absolute bottom feeder idiots aren't going to realize how this works. You're just weighting higher acceptance rates to the white population. Upper class Jews are going to see this and fuck you

[–]DragonerneJesus is white[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

It is a well known statistical paradox for a reason, so while it seems simple once explained, it isn't intuitive for the vast majority of people without an explanation.