you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

I don't buy that for a second. The reason why American hegemony is rotting us is because it's completely dominated by Jews. American ideology has also always been quintessentially liberal, which is yet another reason for the rot. This perpetual pessimism about state power is libertarian nonsense, and it's also disempowering us. It's defeatist poison. State power is what we should seek to attain.

[–]casparvoneverecBig tiddy respecter 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

I never said Europe should be broken into statelets. I want a Europe of great powers, separate great powers. The country of Germany alone has a GDP larger than Turkey, Iran, Iraq, Syria, and SA combined. It has the technical know-how and industrial strength to build a military that can conquer all those nations by itself.

France, Italy, Britain...they are all heavy hitters. They can stand upright in the world and lead an independent existence without fusing into a blob that's ruled by distant technocrats in Brussels.

As for historical determinism, yes, my view might fall on that. What Marx posited was more on the line of technological determinism and it has a strong grain of truth to it. However, that's beside the point. Historical examples and cycles offer insight into human civilizations and their likely outcomes because societies' basic biology, incentives, and hierarchies have fundamentally remained unchanged over the last 3000 years.

Humans have the same lust, fear, desire for glory, devotion to religions, and desire for power today as they did in ancient Sumeria.

Marx's analysis was stupid and flawed because there was never any example of his theory in history. Never in history did the working class/proles/common man rise up, band into communes, overthrow the established society, and form a democratic class society formed of communes.

It's just nonsense that goes against the grain of human biology.

There are countless examples of civilizational cycles of genesis, expansion, apogee, consolidation, decay, and ruin in history. Rome, Greece, Arabs, Assyrians, Sumerians, Babylon, Persia, and countless others as has been demonstrated by writers like Caroll Quigley, Spengler, and John Glubb.

As Caroll Quigley demonstrated in Tragedy and Hope, a lead cause of Europe's success was that it never consolidated into one blob that had a brief apogee and collapsed into decadence. There were attempts like the Hundred Year's War, the 30 years war, the Napoleonic Wars, and the world wars. But it never succeeded until 1945.

And under American consolidation, Europe is now heading in the same direction Mediterranean civilization head under the consolidation of Rome: Ruin and complete destruction by foreigners.

[–]EthnocratArcheofuturist 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

I want a Europe of great powers, separate great powers

I don't. Now is the time for pan-European unity. If you unify all the countries you mentioned they would be even stronger. Obviously I'm talking about a Nietzschean union here, not the current globohomo one.

Humans have the same lust, fear, desire for glory, devotion to religions, and desire for power today as they did in ancient Sumeria.

I wish that was true.

Rome, Greece, Arabs, Assyrians, Sumerians, Babylon, Persia, and countless others as has been demonstrated by writers like Caroll Quigley, Spengler, and John Glubb.

None of them had negrolatry, twerking as "art", drag queen story hour, or trannies in government.

Anyway, I disagree that a Nazi hegemony would have led to the exact same rot and decay we see now. I also disagree with Carroll Quigley's thesis.