Third night of unrest in Sweden over far-right anti-Islam rally

submitted by EthnocratArcheofuturist from self.debatealtright

sorted by:
top
newinsightfulfun
you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]Edjean50 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (23 children)

What exactly is burning the Quran supposed to do? Send a message that Islam is not welcome in Sweden? I really don't know how effective that would be, the centrist Swede probably either won't care or will buy into the leftist narratives of intolerance.

[–]Chipit 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (12 children)

It's supposed to send a message that people are free to protest a backwards homophobic religion.

If they were burning Bibles they'd be supported. But to the left, immigrants must never be criticized, even when they're raping Swedish women and lobbing grenades into police stations.

[–]send_nasty_stuffNational Socialist 6 insightful - 2 fun6 insightful - 1 fun7 insightful - 2 fun -  (6 children)

free to protest a backwards homophobic religion.

Arab and african Islamic immigration should be opposed on it's face. We don't need to analyze the Islamic religion to find reasons to revoke citizenship. They are not Europeans and therefore should not be in the west. Because we fail to push back on ethnic and racial grounds alone, we are forced to fall back on 'progressive liberal values' as the reasoning for resistance. I shouldn't have to implicitly agree with degenerate liberalism to reject arab migration.

Notice how only islamists are allowed to be homophobic in the west. Liberalism clearly prioritizes replacing native Europeans to up holding it's own 'free society' values. Why should we fight for the right to oppose 'backward homophobia' when we've already lost the right to oppose homosexuality itself?

[–][deleted]  (5 children)

[deleted]

    [–]FriedrichLudwig 1 insightful - 2 fun1 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 2 fun -  (3 children)

    One look at this guy's post history makes it obvious he's just a troll. He randomly switches between saying far-right and leftist anti-right/anti-white stuff. For example, he has also said: "The US is not a nation though, it's a multicultural shithole. A true nation consists of a singular ethnic group/race that shares a common ancestry." So there doesn't seem to be a coherent ideology behind his posts. I reccomend reporting and ignoring.

    [–][deleted]  (1 child)

    [deleted]

      [–]FriedrichLudwig 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      "How are East Asian societies weaker and less innovative?"

      "How is it dysgenic?"

      "What about white Muslims?"

      "Goddamn you are one gigantic loser. You probably check under your bed every night to make sure there's no scary nonwhite trying "replace" you. LMAO"

      "What exactly am I "trying" you weird cracker?"

      "The US is not a nation though, it's a multicultural shithole. A true nation consists of a singular ethnic group/race that shares a common ancestry."

      "I hate niggers"

      Salos, you are one weird, mentally screwed up guy, and I have no idea what your agenda is here or why you do this. Now fuck off like you usually do when your sock accounts get banned.

      [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      backwards homophobic religion

      Cringe libtard.

      [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (3 children)

      Libtards defend Islam, they don't criticize it. Poor troll 4/10.

      [–]MarkimusNational Socialist 3 insightful - 2 fun3 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 2 fun -  (2 children)

      You are crying about Islam because it's not liberal, you are a libtard.

      [–]Chipit 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      2/10

      [–]socks-the-nigger 3 insightful - 4 fun3 insightful - 3 fun4 insightful - 4 fun -  (0 children)

      1/10

      [–]Fitter_HappierWhite Nationalist 4 insightful - 1 fun4 insightful - 0 fun5 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      It triggers a jihad which hopefully triggers an immune response from the Swedes.

      [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (7 children)

      Who cares what centrist Swedes think?

      [–]Edjean50 2 insightful - 1 fun2 insightful - 0 fun3 insightful - 1 fun -  (6 children)

      They're the majority of the population.

      [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 7 insightful - 3 fun7 insightful - 2 fun8 insightful - 3 fun -  (5 children)

      So what? The majority of the population was against mass immigration and they still opened the borders. Organized minorities dominate history, not the passive majority.

      [–]Edjean50 2 insightful - 2 fun2 insightful - 1 fun3 insightful - 2 fun -  (4 children)

      I don't agree with that, unless you can provide solid examples. That said can we get back to the original question.

      [–]Rakean93Identitarian socialist 5 insightful - 2 fun5 insightful - 1 fun6 insightful - 2 fun -  (0 children)

      he is right. There are basically no examples where changes were driven by the majority. Obviusly, you need a substantial and dedicated minority. But for examples, bolshevism won because a minority of the oeple of st. petersburg were willing to support Lenin. probably it wasn't eveen close to the 1% o fthe total population. in 1930, when the fascist party was well established as the only political force in Italy, his membership wasn't more than 10 million, on a poulation of 40 millions (obviusly prior to the march on Rome there were evn less fascists). The american revolution was made by a tiny group of people, and the French revolution as well was the result of a fraction of the population of Paris willing to support the revolutionary government. So yeah, in most cases, you just need and organized minority at the center of the events.

      [–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2008_California_Proposition_8

      [–]EthnocratArcheofuturist[S] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

      don't agree with that, unless you can provide solid examples

      What?