you are viewing a single comment's thread.

view the rest of the comments →

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (2 children)

Mass immigration is used by anyone who wants cheap labour instead of paying decent wages to his own people. So you end up with millions of pajeets and negroes sending back loads of money, because they don't have the same living expenses and taxes that state loads upon the backs of its own citizens. Instead, you have "refugees" who pay no taxes, they often live a dozen in a flat which is soon turned into ruins, they leave all kinds of debts behind because you can't go after them, and they often have a "second job" doing robberies and all kinds of crime.

At the same time, natives are obliged to accept the new, lower wages, and are often blackmailed with the usual "I don't need you because I can hire a few pajeets in your place".

Of course there are some who benefit from that. They are traitors and they deserve to have their daughters get married to pakis and go live in Pakistan.

As for the "net benefit to the overall economy", they have been saying this for years yet economy keeps going from bad to worse.

[–][deleted] 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (1 child)

Fair enough, I think it's obvious that this is what's happening to some extent, but are their studies that capture how much money they're sending back?

[–]asterias 1 insightful - 1 fun1 insightful - 0 fun2 insightful - 1 fun -  (0 children)

You can visit any Western Union point and see what's going on. And making "official studies" about that is simply out of the question under the current climate because that would be considered "racist".

You can also visit any state owned hospital and see what is the majority of the patients. Meanwhile, natives have to jump through more and more hoops to have free medical care.